• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Morgan Gibbs-White

Be a move to not lose face.

If there is a release clause and it's met, nothing to be done. It's poor player management on their part. Apparently it was meant to be a secret that he had one.
 
So yeha it looks like they are tinkled because the release clause has been made public, hence us and City coming in. The inference being that the player and his team have been talking to clubs behinds Forests back and leaked the clause.

Thing is, it's common practice now talk to players before agreeing with the club so Forest are just delaying the invevitable.
 
Why would a release clause be a secret? The whole point of a release clause is you tell the club wanting to sign the player that's what you will have to pay for him. Otherwise you are just bidding for a player until it randomly hits a release clause number.

Just sounds like petty nonsense that will be resolved soon enough....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back