• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Contingency planning : When Ange is sacked, who should replace him?

Who do you want as the next Tottenham Hotspur manager?

  • Andoni Iraola

    Votes: 12 18.8%

  • Marco Silva

    Votes: 8 12.5%

  • Thomas Frank

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Kieran McKenna

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Mauricio Pochettino

    Votes: 32 50.0%

  • Edin Tersic

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • A.N. Other

    Votes: 9 14.1%
  • Total voters
    64
Muttley said:
It certainly speaks volumes to what has happened with exiting managers in a recent Spurs culture. All 4 of our last managers have left whilst some very high profile and highly paid players have paid lip service to them and let us fans down. Now we may have not liked those managers but people like me were super critical of guys like the current England and South Korean captains as well as several other senior stars. You could always spot the exceptions who were putting in a shift. I am hoping that the toxic culture in the playing squad was churned out in recent years and this young group WILL be different. That will be a really good sign for our future right?
Click to expand...

I think there was an obvious “downing of tools” under Conte, Jose and Poch.

I don’t think we have seen the same under Ange though. The Maddison “same plan” comments are the first sign we have seen of dissent I think.
 
Muttley said:
I'm OK with Ange leaving as a football decision.

I'm not OK with Ange leaving if the players have quit on their manager though. I'd love them all to fight to keep him so we can really see what his tactical system is all about. It will feel a little bit empty if we don't get to see that after waiting so patiently for the injuries and fatigue phase to pass.

I have a feeling the PL games are going to be a challenge from this point.
Click to expand...
I think the players have kept playing for him and trying to implement his tactics throughout.

Which I think makes how things have gone even worse. Usually you can point to the players not playing for the manager as a reason why things are going wrong, but this situation is heavily caused by tactics.
 
Baleforce said:
I think there was an obvious “downing of tools” under Conte, Jose and Poch.

I don’t think we have seen the same under Ange though. The Maddison “same plan” comments are the first sign we have seen of dissent I think.
Click to expand...
fernadez said:
I think the players have kept playing for him and trying to implement his tactics throughout.

Which I think makes how things have gone even worse. Usually you can point to the players not playing for the manager as a reason why things are going wrong, but this situation is heavily caused by tactics.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, I didn't see the Fulham game. It was certainly implied on MOTD2 that the intensity levels were down. We've obviously looked at the fatigue and injuries factor, and the player's role confusion has been done to death. Then there is the third factor of prioritising EL and coming off the throttle in the league. Perhaps a fourth factor is those players who know they won't be here next season.

Are we sure there are no players putting the brakes on at this point for the other obvious reason? It would be hard to see anyway because of the other reasons.
 
Muttley said:
Unfortunately, I didn't see the Fulham game. It was certainly implied on MOTD2 that the intensity levels were down. We've obviously looked at the fatigue and injuries factor, and the player's role confusion has been done to death. Then there is the third factor of prioritising EL and coming off the throttle in the league. Perhaps a fourth factor is those players who know they won't be here next season.

Are we sure there are no players putting the brakes on at this point for the other obvious reason? It would be hard to see anyway because of the other reasons.
Click to expand...

I’ve kinda forgotten that game, but I think I felt at the time it wasn’t a particularly bad performance for our current incarnation.

Didn’t seem to me that anyone wasn’t trying, it’s just that what we are trying to do doesn’t work.
 
Baleforce said:
I’ve kinda forgotten that game, but I think I felt at the time it wasn’t a particularly bad performance for our current incarnation.

Didn’t seem to me that anyone wasn’t trying, it’s just that what we are trying to do doesn’t work.
Click to expand...

I agree with this partially, but still think we cannot under-estimate the effects of injuries on our squad for months, the subsequent 'all back together and struggling for rhythm/match-fitness' factor, and as has been said, the realisation that our entire season essentially rests on two games...then hopefully the next two...then really really hopefully, one more.
 
Baleforce said:
I think there was an obvious “downing of tools” under Conte, Jose and Poch.

I don’t think we have seen the same under Ange though. The Maddison “same plan” comments are the first sign we have seen of dissent I think.
Click to expand...

There were a lot of 'briefings' during the autumn international breaks. And Romero's comments about the national team medical staff.
 
Gutter Boy said:
There were a lot of 'briefings' during the autumn international breaks. And Romero's comments about the national team medical staff.
Click to expand...
Bedfordspurs said:
Was there?
I havent seen anything negative from the players about the manger, just the opposite
Click to expand...

I think the lines have been broken

- The players have stayed with the manager longer than anyone realistically could expect
- The club has stayed with the manager way longer than anyone would have expected/bet on/can understand

Last couple of weeks, something has changed

- Articles talking about Iriola, Silva, etc.
- The Poch airtime
- Romero's medical comments, Spence (very) slight dig at Ange, the Maddison/Son moment

The club lets these things happen, we know where it goes. Point, Romero has now made that comment more than once, club could have easily pulled him up on the first time, that Spence interview with Rio must have been sanctioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DTA
Baleforce said:
I think there was an obvious “downing of tools” under Conte, Jose and Poch.

I don’t think we have seen the same under Ange though. The Maddison “same plan” comments are the first sign we have seen of dissent I think.
Click to expand...
we are middle of bottom half now - maybe the players have downed tools and don't even know it. might be a case that everyone wants to play for ange but it isn't really top morale stuff even if they tried their best
 
Raziel said:
I think the lines have been broken

- The players have stayed with the manager longer than anyone realistically could expect
- The club has stayed with the manager way longer than anyone would have expected/bet on/can understand

Last couple of weeks, something has changed

- Articles talking about Iriola, Silva, etc.
- The Poch airtime
- Romero's medical comments, Spence (very) slight dig at Ange, the Maddison/Son moment

The club lets these things happen, we know where it goes. Point, Romero has now made that comment more than once, club could have easily pulled him up on the first time, that Spence interview with Rio must have been sanctioned.
Click to expand...
The Spence interview is sanctioned
Have you heard it properly without the edited snippets? It’s. End edited for views and clicks
Romero also made a comment to back the manager just before Christmas don’t forget
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Romero also made a comment to back the manager just before Christmas don’t forget
Click to expand...

The Romero thing is logical. Spurs had done the main part of the injury work and he no doubt got to that point where he needed to do daily activities around the injuries. So no better team to do that than the team in Argentina who are in between national games anyway. Breaks up the monotony for Romero and lets him spend some time at home. Would anyone be surprised if Romero gave these guys (who don't earn that much in the grand scheme of things) a few quid for their troubles?

Anyone would believe that the national medical team fixed Romero because the club team couldn't. I mean, how ridiculous is that?

What is more relevant, if true, is that Romero was only slated to take part in 1 of the 2 international games last week. If that was agreed by both medical teams, clearly Scaloni and Romero thought differently. He's come through unscathed apparently. Normally, the player knows their body best.
 
Muttley said:
I'm OK with Ange leaving as a football decision.

I'm not OK with Ange leaving if the players have quit on their manager though. I'd love them all to fight to keep him so we can really see what his tactical system is all about. It will feel a little bit empty if we don't get to see that after waiting so patiently for the injuries and fatigue phase to pass.

I have a feeling the PL games are going to be a challenge from this point.
Click to expand...
These are not separate things.
 
Raziel said:
I think the lines have been broken

- The players have stayed with the manager longer than anyone realistically could expect
- The club has stayed with the manager way longer than anyone would have expected/bet on/can understand

Last couple of weeks, something has changed

- Articles talking about Iriola, Silva, etc.
- The Poch airtime
- Romero's medical comments, Spence (very) slight dig at Ange, the Maddison/Son moment

The club lets these things happen, we know where it goes. Point, Romero has now made that comment more than once, club could have easily pulled him up on the first time, that Spence interview with Rio must have been sanctioned.
Click to expand...
Behave. As if the club is trying to put out there a load of manager speculation that will unsettle the manager/squad when we are still in the Europa. Sure, we probably won't be winning it but the club are not going to be doing anything to sabotage that right now.

Articles speculating about managers don't just happen when the club allows, 'Poch airtime' has been going on since he left and the player stuff you refer to is much a do about nothing....
 
Mikey10 said:
Peak Guardian.
Click to expand...

That is actually hilarious. No doubt the woke phalanx will be offended on someone else's behalf because he did a John Cleese and mentioned the war. The bit about Rosie being underground for knowing too much. Classic Harry humour.

I bet Tuchel will be laughing his tits off when he sees this. I hope one of the journo's asks him what his response to Harry calling him a German spy in the next England presser.

Also, there is absolutely no nazi salute in that video.
 
Muttley said:
That is actually hilarious. No doubt the woke phalanx will be offended on someone else's behalf because he did a John Cleese and mentioned the war. The bit about Rosie being underground for knowing too much. Classic Harry humour.

I bet Tuchel will be laughing his tits off when he sees this. I hope one of the journo's asks him what his response to Harry calling him a German spy in the next England presser.

Also, there is absolutely no nazi salute in that video.
Click to expand...
Hate to say it, but there really was.:/
He was doing an impression of Tuchel saying yes to the instruction to "go and ruin the team".
The joke is a normal joke that a football fan makes - agent Poch etc and completely tongue in cheek. Nothing wrong with that.
The salute is pretty stupid. But clearly part of the joke - and not surprising for a man of his age; different times (I recently rewatched all of Only Fools..... and it's pretty awful in places, especially in the 1980s. Harry has never really left 1993).
It's all very "uncle at a wedding"

It's pretty brick journalism though - in a time where there are highly influential people making actual Nazi salutes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back