• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

Footballers are allowed to be plonkers, though. It’s priced in. The people who shouldn’t be plonkers are the ones who decide which of the player assets are going to be registered for league games. Those are the ones who have really fùcked up on all this.
Have they?
He decided he wanted to leave.
The manager doesn't want players around that want to leave.
We've made effort to sell him to three different clubs - he turned all three down.

The squad looks like it's what the manager wanted and expected at this point in time (phase one of the rebuild).
It's an unpleasant situation, but such is life.
 
Looks to me as though Richarlison has been trying to force Spurs to cancel his contract and let him go on a free.

Well, quite. Which is still unlikely to happen, but is made slightly more likely by not registering him. To the point where his camp is at least able to deploy threats of legal action as part of their negotiation stance, even if they aren’t that credible.
 
Well, RDZ latest comments suggest that's not on him or the club. (re being in the squad)

Have they?
He decided he wanted to leave.
The manager doesn't want players around that want to leave.
We've made effort to sell him to three different clubs - he turned all three down.

The squad looks like it's what the manager wanted and expected at this point in time (phase one of the rebuild).
It's an unpleasant situation, but such is life.

Letting the manager have a policy of excluding players who want to leave is definitely “on the club”.
 
I'd assume the opposite.... if they were matching his wages, why wouldn't he go there?

I agree, it’s perplexing not to! My initial assumption was that he turned down Everton because he had a bigger offer in Saudi or Turkey. And then that didn’t work out. So now my assumption is that he really wanted to go home to Brazil early.

As I said, I don’t want to say that this whole thing has been an attempt on his part to force the club to cancel his contract, because that would suggest some real bad and selfish intent on his part. But…his actions don’t make sense to read any other way. If Everton’s issue was wages, I’m not sure what the Turkey issue was, and I’m not sure how we would agree a fee with Vasco but not Trabzonspoor.
 
I agree, it’s crazy not to! My initial assumption was that he turned down Everton because he had a bigger offer in Saudi or Turkey. And then that didn’t work out. So now my assumption is that he really wanted to go home to Brazil early.

As I said, I don’t want to say that this whole thing has been an attempt on his part to force the club to cancel his contract, because that would suggest some real bad and selfish intent on his part. But…his actions don’t make sense to read any other way. If Everton’s issue was wages, I’m not sure what the Turkey issue was, and I’m not sure how we would agree a fee with Vasco but not Trabzonspoor.

The issue with Everton was clearly them not being able to afford his current wage and we were not smart enough to make the difference up to get it done.

Possibly another example of the current leadership trying to act big to make a point, when they clearly don't know what they are doing.
 
The issue with Everton was clearly them not being able to afford his current wage and we were not smart enough to make the difference up to get it done.

Richy signed for us in 2022. I find it hard to believe that Everton couldn’t at least match the wages he is on with us , especially in a contract signed by Levy. By all accounts they are matching Grealish’s City contract.

I initially thought it was because Richy saw the Everton move as a lateral move wages wise, but he had a larger offer elsewhere. Hence his thing about not just doing what agents / the club wants anymore. But then not getting the Turkey move doesn’t make sense with that either.
 
Richy signed for us in 2022. I find it hard to believe that Everton couldn’t at least match the wages he is on with us , especially in a contract signed by Levy. By all accounts they are matching Grealish’s City contract.

I initially thought it was because Richy saw the Everton move as a lateral move wages wise, but he had a larger offer elsewhere. Hence his thing about not just doing what agents / the club wants anymore. But then not getting the Turkey move doesn’t make sense with that either.

They are still financially unstable.

Grealish is on loan, he's still getting paid by City, I'm sure Everton are contributing a percentage.

I think you are misreading the man. This situation is almost entirely on the club and manager imo.
 
The issue with Everton was clearly them not being able to afford his current wage and we were not smart enough to make the difference up to get it done. Possibly another example of the current leadership trying to act big to make a point, when they clearly don't know what they are doing.

Why assume a negative interpretation? To say the CEO etc "clearly don't know what they are doing" is - to put it mildly -somewhat OTT. As far as I can see, not buying a quality left wing was their only failing in the transfer window.
 
They are still financially unstable.

Grealish is on loan, he's still getting paid by City, I'm sure Everton are contributing a percentage.

I think you are misreading the man. This situation is almost entirely on the club and manager imo.

The man has had the opportunity for 3 different moves:

A former club close to his heart
A money spinning opportunity in Turkey
A romantic opportunity with his boyhood club

These are just the ones we know about. And none of them have worked out. We also know that he asked to leave. I just don’t see how it is on the club.
 
The issue with Everton was clearly them not being able to afford his current wage and we were not smart enough to make the difference up to get it done.

Possibly another example of the current leadership trying to act big to make a point, when they clearly don't know what they are doing.
The rumors at the time it collapsed were of the loyalty payment he thought he was due from Spurs of 2m that we refused to pay, so the deal dragged out. In the meantime City were finally told no on Gakpo and turned their attentions to Ndiaye, the rest is history. In Richarlson’s tweets you can see he would have been very happy to join Everton if we could have agreed something.
 
Well, quite. Which is still unlikely to happen, but is made slightly more likely by not registering him. To the point where his camp is at least able to deploy threats of legal action as part of their negotiation stance, even if they aren’t that credible.
Threats of legal action mean nothing. If they actually had a case then they would’ve brought the legal action.
 
The guys a bellend and its clearly his own fault. Just remember how much of a rooster you all thought he was before he joined, he is still that rooster but we embrace it as he is one of us.
 
Back