One of my reasons for wanting us to move Bergvall on is to get Gray into his preferred midfield role.
I thought he was excellent at times for us last season in midfield. His ceiling may not quite be as high as Bergvall’s but his floor is significantly higher.
He is hardly going to announce he is one of the leadership group, give him captaincy all pre season and the first game of the season just to sell him.Bergvall isn't the reason Gray is stuck at RB.
If he does go to Brentford that is an absolute shocker of a decision.
He is hardly going to announce he is one of the leadership group, give him captaincy all pre season and the first game of the season just to sell him.
I hear you, but I'm not sure that would necessarily stop/prevent a sale.He is hardly going to announce he is one of the leadership group, give him captaincy all pre season and the first game of the season just to sell him.
I'd be pushing for the move if i was himI'd be worried that Brentford looks a pretty good place for Archie to be. He'd likely play in his favoured position, alongside Sangare and a bunch of other players that look like they could break into Europe.
Gray isn't getting games in midfield not because of Bergvall really but because Fernandes, Tonali and Bentancur are all ahead of him.One of my reasons for wanting us to move Bergvall on is to get Gray into his preferred midfield role.
I thought he was excellent at times for us last season in midfield. His ceiling may not quite be as high as Bergvall’s but his floor is significantly higher.
Fernandes’s ceiling is so high I can honestly see him at PSG, Real Madrid or Barcelona etc in 2 or 3 years time, the question really should be if Gray is prepared to sit around for a season or two while having his development shunted as a utility rb.Gray isn't getting games in midfield not because of Bergvall really but because Fernandes, Tonali and Bentancur are all ahead of him.
Tbh even the thought that he's going to be a an ever present mainstay for us In the long term i find a bit questionable because Fernandes is only a year and a half older but significantly more developed and has a super high ceiling higher than anything I've seen from Gray so unless he becomes the guy who eventually replaces Tonali is he ever likely to hold down a starting spot on merit? Id imagine we would replace Tonali with someone of a similar ilk and Gray doesn't seem to be that player either.
It's going to be interesting to see how it plays out but he doesn't really have the game so far that the truly top midfielders demonstrate.
Gray isn't getting games in midfield not because of Bergvall really but because Fernandes, Tonali and Bentancur are all ahead of him.
Tbh even the thought that he's going to be a an ever present mainstay for us In the long term i find a bit questionable because Fernandes is only a year and a half older but significantly more developed and has a super high ceiling higher than anything I've seen from Gray so unless he becomes the guy who eventually replaces Tonali is he ever likely to hold down a starting spot on merit? Id imagine we would replace Tonali with someone of a similar ilk and Gray doesn't seem to be that player either.
It's going to be interesting to see how it plays out but he doesn't really have the game so far that the truly top midfielders demonstrate.
Do we even have a role for him as the development CM as Bergvall seems to have that role for the minute. I guess if we do get a backup RB or use one of the CBs for that role maybe he becomes an option for those last 10 minutes chances.Fernandes’s ceiling is so high I can honestly see him at PSG, Real Madrid or Barcelona etc in 2 or 3 years time, the question really should be if Gray is prepared to sit around for a season or two while having his development shunted as a utility rb.
It's that ironic or a reference to something? I don't quite get it.We'll take more care of you..........Archie Gray
I see Bergvall filling the Tonali/8 role with Gray the Fernandes/6 role, problem is Bentancur is currently ahead of Gray there.Do we even have a role for him as the development CM as Bergvall seems to have that role for the minute. I guess if we do get a backup RB or use one of the CBs for that role maybe he becomes an option for those last 10 minutes chances.
It's that ironic or a reference to something? I don't quite get it.![]()
Only one injury away from him getting game time in his favored position though. It'll be interesting to see who gets called on first out of Gray, Bergvall and Gallagher should Tonali or Fernandes get injured.Gray isn't getting games in midfield not because of Bergvall really but because Fernandes, Tonali and Bentancur are all ahead of him.
Tbh even the thought that he's going to be a an ever present mainstay for us In the long term i find a bit questionable because Fernandes is only a year and a half older but significantly more developed and has a super high ceiling higher than anything I've seen from Gray so unless he becomes the guy who eventually replaces Tonali is he ever likely to hold down a starting spot on merit? Id imagine we would replace Tonali with someone of a similar ilk and Gray doesn't seem to be that player either.
It's going to be interesting to see how it plays out but he doesn't really have the game so far that the truly top midfielders demonstrate.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.