After the season we've had, after the noise and continual waves of BS which have crashed against our bough, I find it interesting that no-one has considered the fact that Postecoglu probably does not want to stay here much longer. In fact, I think the whole farce is an increasingly poor statement on how we operate. I'd have much more respect for the club in this regard had they bothered to stage ANY sort of protective mechanism/closed ranks around Postecoglu when the brick was really hitting the fan in January. Instead they continued to leave him out there taking the beating, occasionally dribbling a 'it looks like there is no move to replace him' via some such media source.
Even for the many here who don't like him, I ask the following question. Would it really have done the club/us any more harm to have had Munn give a statement saying something to the effect of, "Nobody is satisfied with the results or league positionm least of all Ange and the players, there are significant factors such as injuries, there are several areas of the club which we are reviewing, but we must all back both Ange and the club at this time. Considerations can be taken at the end of the season, until then it is vital that everyone at the club and it's supporters, continue to stay together and focussed."
Or something like that?
I don't think so.
I'll take a wild guess here that Levy is relieved Ange has been the hate punching bag more than him this season, albeit that was in the balance around January, when a statement such as the above would've certainly alleviated some of the pressure building on the manager...
...in the end, this is all a bit like those movies where you see the ending and spend the next 120 minutes getting to how it happened. I feel certain he won't be here, the question is how we got here in the first place...