• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

But no - just moan about entitlement and abuse Koreans.
Lies
All their social media is a pile on and mockery of our Korean fans. Its pretty much replacement theory levels
More Lies
It's quite endemic in their supporters.
2,000 racist rans at the last protest... Even more lies
Lots of 'we want our Tottenham back' posts feature cheery Korean fans draped in merchandise. It's pretty standard right wing dog whistling tactics. Just do things like that, rather than say explicitly what they mean. The skinheads in their posters is the same. It's a base reactionary response by some that way inclined to the increasing diversification of our crowd.
You are so stupid.


They're talking to you here I think.
 
Lies

More Lies

2,000 racist rans at the last protest... Even more lies

You are so stupid.


They're talking to you here I think.


If that's so, could you ask them to write in their next statement something along the lines of 'This protest is not about our Korean fans. We actively celebrate the joy and passion they, and all international visitors, bring to the stadium every match'.

Apologies, as a liberal, im forbidden from entering Musk's hellhole of fascist filth myself.
 
If that's so, could you ask them to write in their next statement something along the lines of 'This protest is not about our Korean fans. We actively celebrate the joy and passion they, and all international visitors, bring to the stadium every match'.

Apologies, as a liberal, im forbidden from entering Musk's hellhole of fascist filth myself.
More shiite!

Get a grip FFS. Making yourself look really stupid now.
 
Is it as ugly as it looks ?
Had a quick read through. Basically says that:

1. The headline profitability/loss number will be heavily influenced by depreciation on the stadium
2. We've blown our load on transfers recently and really pushed the boat out relative to our resources. While we have headroom under PSR, we can't keep spending like we have
3. Wages to turnover spend is the lowest in world football and you have to ask if it's prudence or penny pinching
4. Commercial revenue has grown hugely and that's down to the events at the stadium (which so many macarons in our fan base deride)

Conclusion was that without Uncle Joe & family having a massive change of approach, we'll have to improve with what we have.
 
Had a quick read through. Basically says that:

1. The headline profitability/loss number will be heavily influenced by depreciation on the stadium
2. We've blown our load on transfers recently and really pushed the boat out relative to our resources. While we have headroom under PSR, we can't keep spending like we have
3. Wages to turnover spend is the lowest in world football and you have to ask if it's prudence or penny pinching
4. Commercial revenue has grown hugely and that's down to the events at the stadium (which so many macarons in our fan base deride)

Conclusion was that without Uncle Joe & family having a massive change of approach, we'll have to improve with what we have.

If they still think Uncle Joe is relevant you have to question how joined up their research has been.
 
Had a quick read through. Basically says that:

1. The headline profitability/loss number will be heavily influenced by depreciation on the stadium
2. We've blown our load on transfers recently and really pushed the boat out relative to our resources. While we have headroom under PSR, we can't keep spending like we have
3. Wages to turnover spend is the lowest in world football and you have to ask if it's prudence or penny pinching
4. Commercial revenue has grown hugely and that's down to the events at the stadium (which so many macarons in our fan base deride)

Conclusion was that without Uncle Joe & family having a massive change of approach, we'll have to improve with what we have.
It is quite damning that we have blown our load/pushed the boat out on transfers and what do we have to show for it? Big money transfers Brennan Johnson/Dominic Solanke/James Maddison/Richarlison. I really hope that a couple from Odobert/Tel/Moore/Yang flourish over the next couple of years.

Who do we think would be a good idea to sell to raise some more funds for investment in the summer? Romero is an obvious one if we can get a buyer willing to pay what we want. A couple of the fringe players who could be replaced with younger players? Bissouma might raise some £, Richi perhaps back to Everton? I'm undecided on Maddison, I like him but it's a consistency thing for me and he's been like that everywhere - not sure how much he would go for now anyway....
 
It is quite damning that we have blown our load/pushed the boat out on transfers and what do we have to show for it? Big money transfers Brennan Johnson/Dominic Solanke/James Maddison/Richarlison. I really hope that a couple from Odobert/Tel/Moore/Yang flourish over the next couple of years.

Who do we think would be a good idea to sell to raise some more funds for investment in the summer? Romero is an obvious one if we can get a buyer willing to pay what we want. A couple of the fringe players who could be replaced with younger players? Bissouma might raise some £, Richi perhaps back to Everton? I'm undecided on Maddison, I like him but it's a consistency thing for me and he's been like that everywhere - not sure how much he would go for now anyway....
We've spent a good bit on Bergvall, Kinsky, Odobert, Tel, Gray and lads from previous windows like VdV, Udogie, Porro, Sarr etc.

Could it be argued that the club have taken a very long term view on squad building and what we're experiencing now, not withstanding the fact that Ange is underachieving by any metric, is the pain you have to go through by building for the long term?
 
Back