• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** Tottenham Hotspur v Nottingham Forest ***

I'm going to this game, second time at the lane this season (Brentford the other). Forest have been very good this season and its a massive game for them to get back into the CL places. We are only playing for pride now, the youth staking a claim and the experienced players proving they can play better than they have been. A win today is too much to hope for, so going for a draw, 2-2.

C O Y S
 
Good team. Glad to see Richie start and Tel to build on his confident display.

No Gray though, would have liked to see him next to Sarr.

COYS! Reckon Richie will score.
 
Should be plenty of movement in those front 3. A lot stronger than I thought.
Thought Moore might have made the bench.

Hopefully gray get some game time today.
 
Goose said:
to sell their product, i suppose the likes of Sky Sports and their foreign equivalents have to pump up this nonsense of Spurs being "entertaining". We are abysmal to watch in general.
Click to expand...
It's code for 'entertaining for the neutral', also known as being rubbish.
 
fernadez said:
Mathematically safe now.

The lads can play without any pressure.
Click to expand...

They’ve been playing without (applying) any pressure for months in the PL, hence the relegation level form.

Hopefully now the squad is almost back to full strength we’ll go on an unbeaten run similar to that which we saw during Postecoglou’s first 10 games.
 
I wonder if we will break with Premier League tradition, and NOT let them have a massive chance within the first 90 seconds. It would be a novel approach for an Ange team.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back