Leeds Spur
Banned
Fair play mate. If its there take it.
Over qualified is just another way if saying 'I'm too good for that job' surely?
If you've got all the a levels under the sun I get that you might not want to work in McDonald's but it still strikes me as looking down on the 'minions'
Have been applying for shop work. I have a physics degree, employers tell me they do not want me because they do not expect me to stay there for a long enough period.
They're perfectly right, getting a job there won't stop me applying for something better. And if something better comes up i would jump at the chance. They would much prefer to hire someone who is going to be there longer term.
Therefore they deem me 'overqualified'.
They can't discriminate against you on the basis that you 'might leave'?!?!!!
Everyone is in the same boat that they'd leave for more wonga!!
Not wishing to offend anybody in this thread, but I'd like to open up another debate.
Surely it is up to the interviewee to present their CV and work history in a way that would make them attractive to a prospective employer.
Similarly, during interview, it would be prudent to talk about aspects of your previous employment that a new employer would find useful. Rather than bleating on about work or experience you have that has no relevance to the role you are applying for.
The argument "I didn't get the job because I was over qualified" doesn't seem logical.
Not getting a job you are more than qualified to do indicates you fudged the interview process. Not the other way around.
They can't discriminate against you on the basis that you 'might leave'?!?!!!
Everyone is in the same boat that they'd leave for more wonga!!
They can discriminate against you on whatever basis they want, that's the whole point of an interview process.
Everyone would be in the same boat, however is someone with a degree or somebody with 5 GCSE's more likely to get a better job?
Depends. I see what you mean by the way. Take me. No qualifications at all. Didn't turn up to half of my GCSE'S yet have been working for my entire adult life, zero sickness, zero problems with lateness and earning a great wage. My friend from school went to university, worked his arse off, has a levels coming out of his arse and can't get a job cos he thinks he's too good for some offered to him.
Now as an employer if you compared our two cvs you'd probably take him but his attitude stinks and he works in a wether spoons part time and calls in sick regularly.
Give me someone likeme any day of the week. I help with recruiting by note taking in interviews and I wouldn't like to give the nod to someone from uni.
I think my posts have been reasonable in the thread tbh.
Not wishing to offend anybody in this thread, but I'd like to open up another debate.
Surely it is up to the interviewee to present their CV and work history in a way that would make them attractive to a prospective employer.
Similarly, during interview, it would be prudent to talk about aspects of your previous employment that a new employer would find useful. Rather than bleating on about work or experience you have that has no relevance to the role you are applying for.
The argument "I didn't get the job because I was over qualified" doesn't seem logical.
Not getting a job you are more than qualified to do indicates you fudged the interview process. Not the other way around.
Not wishing to offend anybody in this thread, but I'd like to open up another debate.
Surely it is up to the interviewee to present their CV and work history in a way that would make them attractive to a prospective employer.
Similarly, during interview, it would be prudent to talk about aspects of your previous employment that a new employer would find useful. Rather than bleating on about work or experience you have that has no relevance to the role you are applying for.
The argument "I didn't get the job because I was over qualified" doesn't seem logical.
Not getting a job you are more than qualified to do indicates you fudged the interview process. Not the other way around.
Very naive mate, very naive...
Is that not essentially lying on your CV?So are you sending the same CV (the over qualified one), to all prospective employers?
If so, you're doing it wrong
I think not understanding the selection / interview process is naive
So are you sending the same CV (the over qualified one), to all prospective employers?
If so, you're doing it wrong
I have about 20 different CVs listed in categories highlighting different levels of experience and skill sets
If you go too far in bending your history, its called lying