alekaras
The ITK of IDK
That's the weirdest stat I have ever heard of.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Willian José
- Thread starter Denmark Spur
- Start date
Kandi1977
Garth Crooks
Not really. It tells you quite a lot. Would you rather have a player that often scores the first goal, the winner or the last goal in a +2 goal win?
SteveAWOL
Barry Daines
Considering how many times we’ve thrown away a lead over the past 12 months, my preference is:
1) the winner
2) the last scorer in a 2+ goal win
3) first goal (and pray for a clean sheet!)
Kandi1977
Garth Crooks
You think different to me. My order would be:
1) the winner
2) first goal. Why? Because getting the first goal is often crucial to getting control of the game. Yes, we have lost quite a few where we scored first, but that is an anomaly. Also the first goal might also be the winner.
3) Last goal in a +2 win. You aren't really affecting the game when you just add to an already comfortable victory.
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Fergie once commented on VDV vs Walclam when asked who he would prefer... VDV as he scores the important goals. When asked what he meant he said the first or last goal in a 1 goal win. Walclam scores hat tricks in a 6 nil win
Amazing that they want €21m and we've only offered half that amount!
His scoring record is ok, but then he's spent almost his entire career on loan and never really been in a team which might dominate matches and where he'll get chances (hopefully at Spurs he would be).
He seems mobile and someone who would lead the line like Kane does and for the price, I cant see that we'll get anyone more proven
His scoring record is ok, but then he's spent almost his entire career on loan and never really been in a team which might dominate matches and where he'll get chances (hopefully at Spurs he would be).
He seems mobile and someone who would lead the line like Kane does and for the price, I cant see that we'll get anyone more proven
Legohamster
Ian Walker
According to Spanish papers we have agreed personal terms but nowhere near the players valuation
I hate those fudging diagrams!!!
Can we please all agree to standardise on my template below:-
Bullet
Colin Calderwood
Like Aaron Lennon. That stupid stat "Spurs never lose when Lennon scores" was because he hardly ever scored, and when he did it was the 4th goal in a rout.
Don't bother spewing the exceptions at me, I don't want to have to clean myself up after.
Glenda's Legs
Paul Walsh
Another complication similar to the Dybala one?
(This is the only mention I've seen of a third party involvement)
Pirate55
The Last Man Standing 17/18
Remembering of course, the first goal could also be the winner! It does at the very least ensure teams have to abandon their defensive block and open themselves up. The first goal is often the key to the result.
Ade's folks are ok really
Ramon Vega
Usual problem then...
- Player agrees terms and wants to force a move (allegedly);
- Club don't play said player as "his mind is elsewhere";
- Crucially, Levy thinks he can use this as a way of haggling down the price;
- Transfer stalls for 2 weeks over fee negotiations;
- We eventually sign said player on final day after Levy saves himself whopping 500k, but as a result the player needs 3wks to acclimatise to PL, adjust to English life and force his way into first team;
- Player manages all of about 4-6 games with no time left to find a run of form;
- Said player labelled as a flop by media as Kane-less season tails off to a damp squid;
- Fans blame Levy for not pulling his finger out quick enough over the transfer.
We all know the drill, inevitably.
- Player agrees terms and wants to force a move (allegedly);
- Club don't play said player as "his mind is elsewhere";
- Crucially, Levy thinks he can use this as a way of haggling down the price;
- Transfer stalls for 2 weeks over fee negotiations;
- We eventually sign said player on final day after Levy saves himself whopping 500k, but as a result the player needs 3wks to acclimatise to PL, adjust to English life and force his way into first team;
- Player manages all of about 4-6 games with no time left to find a run of form;
- Said player labelled as a flop by media as Kane-less season tails off to a damp squid;
- Fans blame Levy for not pulling his finger out quick enough over the transfer.
We all know the drill, inevitably.
milo
Jack L. Jones
What's the alternative? Paying a £70m release fee for a journeyman? He seems like a sensible player to provide cover but it seems unlikely that he will set the league alight. He's probably worth £20-25m to us but that is low in the current market.
Ade's folks are ok really
Ramon Vega
I think both clubs acknowledge that the hefty release clause isn't going to be adhered to by either party. So my point is that Levy needs to get something done sooner rather than later. But he'll never learn. Pinching a few pennies here and there seems more valuable to him than the notion of getting him integrated into the squad quickly.
milo
Jack L. Jones
Let's see how this pans out before deciding what we have done wrong
greatwhitenorf
Edgar Davids
Very sensible.
Not what's needed, though.
Not what's needed, though.