Then comment on the story, not on your misplaced and erroneous view of my need for diversity training (bellend euphemism for political brainwashing) you patronising so and so.
You like others in this thread, have looked at this as an attack on Muslim people, when it isn't.
The incident, if it has been accurately reported is a sad indictment of the muddled thinking of chumps like you, who seem to forget what the security staff at airports are trying to do - and trying to prevent. Creating a culture of being too afraid to comment is hardly a shining example of diversity training doing its job, is it?
So Mr Bonehead, before you mount your podium of self appointed righteousness, I suggest you address the isues in the real world, and not the ****eyed view that twits like you take on things. I'm pretty sure that the majority of Muslims think people like you are tacos, for finding it more impoortant for security staff to take a stand on religious consciousness rather than the basics of stopping people dying at the hands of a religious nutcase. I doubt very much that the family of dead muslims who died in an aircraft bombing by deranged muslims will get much solace from the fact that "Oh well at least our childs murderer was a fellow Muslim."
I can take any amount of disagreement on anything I post, but not if its some tangential load of twaddle that has little or no relevance to the highlighting of a spectacular own goal by the gormless chumps who invent macaronic terms like diversity training and use it to peddle an agenda that bears little resemblance to the real issues in a real world.
Mr. Cooper, I have clearly upset you and for that I am not sorry.
To debate an issue such as this on a public forum takes a level head, a grasp of the facts, and a willingness to appreciate views other than your own.
I stand by my views. Unlike you, I will also not let this get personal and resort to insults.
Whilst you may feel you can intimidate and belittle others from behind your keyboard; I am not one of them.
To quote you:
The incident, if it has been accurately reported is a sad indictment of the muddled thinking of chumps like you, who seem to forget what the security staff at airports are trying to do - and trying to prevent. Creating a culture of being too afraid to comment is hardly a shining example of diversity training doing its job, is it?
No, the incident has been reported to sell a newspaper. The incident is totally one sided as such we only have Fireman Sams word as to what actually happened. And you, like all the other mischief-makers chose to take that as gospel.
He has claimed to have said ÔÇ£If I was wearing this scarf over my face I wonder what would happen?ÔÇØ
Really? Why would you wear a scarf over you face? It is not a symbol of his culture or religious belief. What a stupid comment. What is it, if itÔÇÖs not to provoke a reaction?
Why does Sam feel the need to single her out. A proud Muslum woman minding her own business passing through security. Is it to let off some steam perhaps, because the world is changing. It is no longer ruled by the British Empire and we are no longer living in the dark ages.
Now for a lesson in diversity ÔÇô which you so openly detest.
If she was wearing the Hijab, her face would have been there for all to see. However the inaccurate and misleading report to which you base your crusade on makes the mistake of claiming she was wearing a hijab ÔÇÿwithout showing her faceÔÇÖ.
This sounds more like a Niqab. But then youÔÇÖd know that had you been given some diversity training by those you refer to as ÔÇÿgormless chumpsÔÇÖ.
If I were to be constructive about your post, from itÔÇÖs tone, you appear nothing more than a firebrand. A politically incorrect attention seeker whoÔÇÖs clearly after some kind of cult following on a message board.
Pathetic.
