I agree fully. Anything done "by committee" seems to get flak, but I like that there's more than one man making those decisions. Not least you need someone with the long term financial interests of the club at the table, and in my opinion for a club like us to succeed at the level we want to be you need a transfer policy that targets younger players over more experienced in general (not to say that there can't be any exceptions).
I deal with Committees on a daily basis and half of them who sit on those things dont have a clue and it becomes a tea, coffee and biscuit session.
I agree, also with Billy, that the longer term future needs to be borne in mind when buying players but as I said that would have been the strategy which im sure would have been discussed and agreed with AVB.
So if AVB wants a Mark Schwarzer for 100k a week on a 5 yr contract, Levy rightly so would reject it. However if AVB says there is x player and fits within my budget then Levy should go out get him. The Committee, which im sure AVB would sit on, shouldnt be deciding that as they would have agreed the strategy and AVB chose a player who fits that strategy.
Those players we brought in the summer, in my view werent AVB signings and to have players who the Manager never chose actually costs more money than had it been AVB bringing in HIS players. Its counter productive.
Billy - im not talking about giving AVB control, as he has a policy to work within, but you gotta give him control over who he brings in providing its within the policy.
(Its obvious that I dont think many, if any of them, were AVB signings so it shapes the way im thinking things in here)