Here i dont think 'literally' was pushing the boat out. He looked extremely frightened to me, wouldn't rule it out totally. Although I have to admit that the evidence is circumstantial.
:lol:
Here i dont think 'literally' was pushing the boat out. He looked extremely frightened to me, wouldn't rule it out totally. Although I have to admit that the evidence is circumstantial.
You'ev supported us for 50 years?! Then you should know better. We're going to be top 4 this season, probably top 3. And that's not good enough?!
I remember we were chasing Chelsea and he brought defoe, we got battered, and everyone (probably you included) crucified him for changing the shape and "2 UP FRONT DOESN'T WORK!!!!" "HARRY'S fudgeD US UP!!". Fact is, a lot of fans on this board don't know what they're talking about and speak utter cack, and will slag off Harry whatever he does if the result doesn't go perfectly for us.
People need to stop going on about us dominating the game, Given didnt even have a save to make really. Lots of huff and puff, possessions, crosses, corners etc but not really any chances.
Dominating is when Arse, Utd, City etc are missing 3/4 one on ones and open headers gamer after game etc
maybe not everyone else saw it as a must win at that stage of the game.
maybe we'd played for 40+ mins with 10 against 11 and that was the point at which it was decided that discretion was the better part of valour - better take a point than none.
so you're saying that Harry has never positively affected a game once it starts? he 'always comes up short'?
Redknapp just fudge off. fudge OFF. You knew that Saudi Sportswashing Machine lost and we had nothing to lose, and you bring on Scott Parker for VDV. Any other manager would have made an offensive substitution and you bring on a DM when Villa had fudge all during the whole game. fudge OFF.
No. I didn't say Harry has never positively affected a game. He certainly isn't a tactician though by any stretch.
Why do you put words into my mouth rather than state your own point of view?.
I also havent said that winning away against 10 men is a given. I dont think, however, waiting until the 89th minute to bring on Scott Parker constitutes an optimal tactical approach from the manager.
[/B]
It doesnt mean he isnt though, just because you say hes not.
Where was the 'gamble' in the last 5 minutes? putting on a defensive midfielder?
i have stated my own view, clearly.
you said he alwayscomes up short, ergo, he's never positively influenced a game during play.
you don't, but he might. it doesn't necessarily make him wrong because you disagree. that's a pretty simple statement.
No, it makes him wrong in my opinion :-s
Armchair Expert !
If ever there was a case of "state the f^cking obvious" then you're moniker sums it up perfectly .
Rather than look at 90 minutes of something that irks you , maybe You should put into context where we are, where you thought we would be and where we could be. It's called real life , not armchair opinions.
indeed, but you state it like a fact.
well that's not correct, is it.
if we'd have both lost and we lose next week, a draw for them would have seen them above us.
in that respect it's a valuable point.
you saw Rose's red card, right?
Sums up our 2012 really...
Twitter / @OptaJoe: 1 - Tottenham have won just one game after falling behind in the Premier League this season. Forlorn.