I think the standing rails are already installed in the lower south stand? Does that mean if it is allowed all that would need changing are the seats? Is our view to be restricted as we have to sit? Shall I ask another question?
No need to change the seats. It's designed to work as it is. You look over the railing while seatedI think the standing rails are already installed in the lower south stand? Does that mean if it is allowed all that would need changin are the seats? Is our view to be restricted as we have to sit? Shall I ask another question?
Ah ok. Safe to say though that if I am to sit in the 14th row of that stand I wont be sitting anyway? Regardless of whether standing is permitted in the future or not.No need to change the seats. It's designed to work as it is. You look over the railing while seated
Walking out to the exit?Ah ok. Safe to say though that if I am to sit in the 14th row of that stand I wont be sitting anyway? Regardless of whether standing is permitted in the future or not.
Boom boom. Never gonna hear the end of these am I?Walking out to the exit?
you will if you stay to the endBoom boom. Never gonna hear the end of these am I?
I am (or was once upon a time) and have zero doubts. The wiring blueprints for a build this size is the stuff of nightmares and if you saw them I think you'd understand how things could go wrong in this area by using a sub-contractor just not quite up to scratch. Considering the ambitious timeline for this project something like this was always a risk. Anything structural will have been modelled/tested up the wazoo. A few months delay is annoying (and expensive) but it's not the end of the world.
I like to marvel at the majesty of the place and know that we are the envy of every club in England.
What worries me about this whole thing is precisely that - the atrocious build management.
What other bits of the stadium might be sub-par, but which we wouldn't know about? I suppose the f*cked-up wiring systems were easily noticed once the testing started, but now I'm vaguely questioning everything from the 'trees' supporting the single-tier end (was the stress testing done all right?) to the cladding (was it put in place properly? Will it fall off?).
I don't know, I'm certainly no builder. And as I've said before, I couldn't care less when it opens, as long as it's completely safe when it does. But I hope to GHod that there's nothing else that was f*cked up during the build - because that might come back to bite us months, years or decades down the line.
Anyone better versed in construction with a more optimistic view? I'd be grateful for one.
This could be a good way of running the clock down, just play the ball into the corner and then slide that bit if the pitch under the stadium. 99% sure there are no rules against this...It was fun earlier today watching them split up the pitch at MegaLane then re-connect it multiple times.
It would be nice dishing out a 'touching the void' experience to hazard,Salah,herrera (insert clam here) as and when we desire.
It would be nice dishing out a 'touching the void' experience to hazard,Salah,herrera (insert clam here) as and when we desire.
We played on a building site the entire last season at old WHL.Forgive what probably are daft questions but in the latest video from Chris, the video wall on the side going up the stairs had two massive black rectangles when they were showing a static image. These can’t be dead pixels already can they? With regards to opening the stadium whilst the final finishing touches are still being worked on, had that happened before in the UK? Must be a H&S nightmare to open a site still a building site in bits. I also notice the ticket office looks like is has a lot of work to be done. Surely that would need to be totally finished before a game is played? Sorry one more question. Was the grey and white cladding on the outside a late addition to the plans? I am surprised there wasn’t more scaffolding to get it down a lot quicker.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk Pro