• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Tottenham Hotspur Karen Club....what do they do?

Aldo said:
That must taste bizarre
Click to expand...

Don't think he'd mix the two actually together, just think he is probably a quiet night in type of guy, curtains closed, Cats locked away, pot noodle in the microwave and Kleenex out ;)
 
nayimfromthehalfwayline said:
Well Guv, what can I say? You're not having the discourse you think you are, but Im still finding you good value.
Click to expand...

That's wonderful and your attempts at eloquence are duly noted but you are a bit repetitive. Might not be the first time you've heard that though? Hanging onto the guv and laddy parts that seem to have mortally offended you is lovely but plagiarism is to be frowned upon
 
Libero said:
That's wonderful and your attempts at eloquence are duly noted but you are a bit repetitive. Might not be the first time you've heard that though? Hanging onto the guv and laddy parts that seem to have mortally offended you is lovely but plagiarism is to be frowned upon
Click to expand...

Not hanging onto, just pointing out how sad they are. Not mortally offended, rather just chuckling at you going full depart.
 
nayimfromthehalfwayline said:
Not hanging onto, just pointing out how sad they are. Not mortally offended, rather just chuckling at you going full retread.
Click to expand...

It's been said to me by a few of people on here that you tend to attack people who don't speak positively about the club on a whole variety of issues, even down to trivial thoughts such as a predicted result in a game. Now, can't say I've noticed you before and I don't know if its necessarily true or if its mischief making from people you have clashed with before but then if you have had a 'coming together' with a few people then it might have a ring of truth to it? Why would people take the time to tell me that?
 
Libero said:
It's been said to me by a few of people on here that you tend to attack people who don't speak positively about the club on a whole variety of issues, even down to trivial thoughts such as a predicted result in a game. Now, can't say I've noticed you before and I don't know if its necessarily true or if its mischief making from people you have clashed with before but then if you have had a 'coming together' with a few people then it might have a ring of truth to it? Why would people take the time to tell me that?
Click to expand...

Very good question, Ive no idea why people would even bother. Or that Ive a reputation for going round attacking people, especially on such silly premise.

I wonder if its more likely mischief making on your part. If anyone has been messaging you, they are welcome to message me too - maybe we can clear things up.

I support the club, of course. Ill back them against unjust criticism, of which there is plenty. If someone has something valid to say, why would I "attack" them? Answer: I wouldnt.

You'll notice I didnt attack you at all, until this:
Libero said:
RADA have called me lad, want to know when you can attend?
Click to expand...

Up to then, I was explaining my position where I felt necessary. All the while you were making statements such as:

it seems to be fashionable for those who don't like any questioning at all of the messiah who disagree with them even existing

it isn't all about ego as some of the 'im alright jack' supporters on here suggest and who have whopping egos that need massaging themselves

Galling, Prickish behaviour with a breathless arrogance from some on here (those 3 in your first post in the thread)

I do wonder though with some of the brainwashing on here

What a complete load of rubbish

I'm not even a member of the trust but glad they are there to at least attempt to neutralise the selfish attitude from followers like yourself. Probably on the payroll as a social media guru for Graham Roberts

I can only assume a vested interest like being on the payroll or something personal.

Some good people on here but equally some self righteous sheep who feel they are the oracle and don't like being disagreed with.

Being the self absorbed, conceited Prick that you are, it was never going to be possible for you not to reply

And generally picking fights left and right.

Before I get accused of making a big effort to try and take you down or some nonsense, this was literally in the first handful of posts. It goes on and on, I only made minimal effort.

Which is really why Ive been teasing you, the irony/ignorance in your approach and then reaction to getting picked up on it - havent seen the like in a while.

And no, thats not jabbing you for a response - genuinely its been a long time.
 
Libero said:
And yet you are drawn to it and just can't leave it alone? Some self reflection required.




You are right Tommy, its gotten out of hand and its all very regrettable. No need for this at all. Lets pack up and call it day.
Click to expand...

Go buy each other a beer, and then fudge each other’s brains out, Brokeback style. The repressed sexual tension in this thread has been palpable...
 
Sometimes it becomes obvious that you just need to agree to disagree....the problem with trading insults/put downs is you may well agree or, GHod forbid, have something in common on other subjects but you forego that just to tit for tat like those two mad bitches on loose women.
 
nayimfromthehalfwayline said:
Very good question, Ive no idea why people would even bother. Or that Ive a reputation for going round attacking people, especially on such silly premise.

I wonder if its more likely mischief making on your part. If anyone has been messaging you, they are welcome to message me too - maybe we can clear things up.

I support the club, of course. Ill back them against unjust criticism, of which there is plenty. If someone has something valid to say, why would I "attack" them? Answer: I wouldnt.

You'll notice I didnt attack you at all, until this:


Up to then, I was explaining my position where I felt necessary. All the while you were making statements such as:

it seems to be fashionable for those who don't like any questioning at all of the messiah who disagree with them even existing

it isn't all about ego as some of the 'im alright jack' supporters on here suggest and who have whopping egos that need massaging themselves

Galling, Prickish behaviour with a breathless arrogance from some on here (those 3 in your first post in the thread)

I do wonder though with some of the brainwashing on here

What a complete load of rubbish

I'm not even a member of the trust but glad they are there to at least attempt to neutralise the selfish attitude from followers like yourself. Probably on the payroll as a social media guru for Graham Roberts

I can only assume a vested interest like being on the payroll or something personal.

Some good people on here but equally some self righteous sheep who feel they are the oracle and don't like being disagreed with.

Being the self absorbed, conceited Prick that you are, it was never going to be possible for you not to reply

And generally picking fights left and right.

Before I get accused of making a big effort to try and take you down or some nonsense, this was literally in the first handful of posts. It goes on and on, I only made minimal effort.

Which is really why Ive been teasing you, the irony/ignorance in your approach and then reaction to getting picked up on it - havent seen the like in a while.

And no, thats not jabbing you for a response - genuinely its been a long time.
Click to expand...

The bold part is the issue though isn't it? You are the arbiter of what is decided valid rather than having a discussion. Why is that? And that ties in with what has been said to me. I don't suppose they wish to contact you for a discussion if they have had run ins with you before, I didn't ask.

None of the stuff you have pulled up was related to you and they weren't in the first posts either. As you well know, they were in the main, a response to one specific poster. And my response to you was because you were being over dramatic with a specific line, I wasn't abusive to you, it was a humorous retort which you understood as you gave a similar one back which is fine, no problem at all.

As for the posts, I stand by them. Some people do have a selfishness that runs deeps, certainly regarding their own position as a ST holder for however long. I don't need anyone to validate that for me, I've been on here since 2005 and obviously since 2012 when it rebooted. Anything I said, with the exception of the first post which was an opinion based one on the subject matter, was in direct response to someone......it takes two to tango.

And there is no picking fights left and right - Most responses were to you and one other, I had a perfectly acceptable discussion with another poster which ended in agreeing to disagree on most of what we discussed. If people choose then to involve themselves while being gobby with it then who is going to stand back and say nothing? Would you or I do that in real life? Why is that expected on here or rather why do people feel it acceptable to jump in a two way and mouth off? At least with you and the other poster it was an individual response each time just to one another.

Listen, you haven't been teasing me, be real. You wanted the last word each time and that's fine, I'm no different to you on that score. There is no irony in my approach or ignorance, I gave out what I gave back generally speaking. If you came for confrontation then you got it, as I said earlier, I don't really know why that surprises you? You or the others who have initiated some of what has gone on wouldn't do it in person but you feel its ok here? You might have taken exception to the first post but it singled no one specific person out in that, if you felt that related to you then I can't help that but it obviously upset you and that is not what was intended.

My final response is the part I've bolded in italics, " I support the club, of course". Supporting the club, that's right. Not an individual player, manager or the board but the Club. That means that you can feel a way about a certain manager, player or the board but still support the club, ie that it is possible. You do understand that? The Club is bigger than all those entities and we all want what is best for it. Just because you or anyone else here has a different viewpoint to how that is achieved does not make you a better supporter or validate someone's macaronic statement of being an Arsenal, City, Chelsea and whoever else cliched I can throw in, Supporter. You and the others who have got involved don't have any more right than me to express what I feel about how the club is run, conducts itself etc so for all that calling out of me, in the interests of fairness, which I am sure you are a proponent of, it would be right to address some of the other active participants with the judgement of being ignorant/argumentative/ironic/stupid etc

To that end, I'm now done with this thread, it didn't need to go this way and I played my part in it and share my responsibility but I won't be responding to anymore barbs. If you or anyone else wants to carry that on or speak with me then DM me...….it's gone far off topic and there is no point to it anymore. As far as I am concerned, we agree to disagree and that's it.
 
Libero said:
The bold part is the issue though isn't it? You are the arbiter of what is decided valid rather than having a discussion. Why is that? And that ties in with what has been said to me. I don't suppose they wish to contact you for a discussion if they have had run ins with you before, I didn't ask.
Click to expand...

I am the arbiter of what I think is valid, of course I am, its called having an opinion.

When I agree with someone, Ill say "I agree", and when I dont Ill say that I dont and why. Which is, actually, a discussion.

There have been many here I have absolutely disagreed with, and yet have nothing but respect for. This idea I go round attacking people is really quite funny.

Libero said:
Listen, you haven't been teasing me, be real. You wanted the last word each time and that's fine, I'm no different to you on that score. There is no irony in my approach or ignorance, I gave out what I gave back generally speaking. If you came for confrontation then you got it, as I said earlier, I don't really know why that surprises you? You or the others who have initiated some of what has gone on wouldn't do it in person but you feel its ok here? You might have taken exception to the first post but it singled no one specific person out in that, if you felt that related to you then I can't help that but it obviously upset you and that is not what was intended.
Click to expand...

Genuinely - hand on heart - absolutely I was just winding you up and watching you go. Im not that invested in you or your opinion to have it bother me. And no, not a barb - and not a last word thing - simply the truth.

I do disagree with the points you have raised, I think you are wrong. More than that I disagree with how you have raised them, hence making a bit of a monkey of you.

Though that has of course backfired, as I look silly too now.

I can agree its done though, and to agree to disagree. So whatever, lets leave it there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back