Ok, so that’s fair and that’s your view, and I can be open to other views.
Let me suggest a third option, which of course you don’t have to agree with.
For the EL we were favourites to win, so we must have been at some level a half decent side to be deemed as such. However to me, the nuance of it is that with no other Chanpions league teams in there we could be favourites because the level of competition we had in the competition was actually much closer to our general level. Simply out of you had, I don’t know, a few more Inters, a Milan, perhaps a Chelsea or just someone of this level, I don’t think we would have been favourites. I think our reputation if you like is as being ‘nearly men’ and as such people don’t expect us to win things so the fact we were favourites felt more to me as a “even Spurs should be winning this”.
I think it was a view built on the competition we faced. I don’t think we had an easy ‘just turn up’ type run, we can only beat who is in front of us, and look, any competition you still have to get it over the line, so we absolutely deserved it. I just think I agree with you in the sense we were favourites, but I think that’s because the competition had lots of teams who were all in our ball park of generally decent but not fantastic squads. This is why I think we’ve managed to win it, but still not have a fantastic squad.
By all means, feel free to not agree, it’s a forum after all, I’m not trying to be narky, I just think there’s more nuance than the two options you suggest I.e favourites, so good squad, or massive achievement.
I think we’re an average squad, who played a Europa League campaign, against many other fairly average squads, but actually winning it with our trophy history, for us still makes it a massive achievement in our terms.