That’s always been a huge issue with the changes to the rulesFact that the City defender stepped up to play him offside, succeeded and was then punished for being out of position is enough interference for me.
Surely a defeat here has got to be the end for Fat Frank?
Brighton's scouting is top notch.
2 points between 14th and 20th though
He was well rated before BrightonWho's scouting these Brighton managers?
Also is there some unwritten rule where Liverpool have to be called 'Liverpool Football Club' at all times?
At least that's what I just mentioned to mr GL.
It's been the norm in other leagues for some time. Both players and managers interviewed at half time. RidiculousCan’t Sky F-off with their walking off the pitch interview with the player.
Are they really expecting some scintillating insight?
It's been the norm in other leagues for some time. Both players and managers interviewed at half time. Ridiculous
Their main man Winstanley has. Not sure about anyone else.Their recruitment team just went to chelsea. So have no idea what's going on.
Should be about gaining an advantageSo this was offside, but Rashford wasn't...
It's ridiculous. But this clip shows how it should be imo. If you're in an offside position, and the ball is played towards you, you're offside.
Just seen the Rashford not-offside. How on earth can he not be interfering with play when he's millimetres away from striking the ball?
Since when do you have to touch the ball to be interfering with play?
If things stay as they are now, that's Everton and West Ham into the bottom three, and along with SCBC, all on 15 points.
Then it's open for interpretation, like it's now. It should be clearer, without so much interpretation, that leads to different ways of viewing it.Should be about gaining an advantage
Rashford made an attempt to gain an advantage by running after the ball so was off