• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The "Official" 2013/14 Other teams matches thread

Jordinho said:
It's the way Chelsea have deliberately sent him to clubs that aren't considered direct threats to themselves, but good enough to trouble those that are. They just bought him to make sure nobody else could, just in case he might become good sometime in the future.
Click to expand...

he chose everton. He has simply been sent out on loan for experience. At Chelsea with Torres, Ba and Eto'o he was never going to play as many as he would at WBA or Everton. Its how a loan works amazingly.
 
Mumorn said:
why does it make a difference? if he played for chelsea wouldnt he still be affecting rivals results or are you making **** up
Click to expand...

Because in the meantime Chelsea drop a load more cash (in wages) on Eto'o for example, whilst hoovering up young talent (with money they didn't earn), waiting for them to incubate at another club.

During the incubation, the player scores goals that helps out his parent club. I think it's a corruption of the system, an unintended consequence of having financially doped clubs with squads so big they don't know what to with them.
 
Hotshot-Tottenham said:
Because in the meantime Chelsea drop a load more cash (in wages) on Eto'o for example, whilst hoovering up young talent (with money they didn't earn), waiting for them to incubate at another club.

During the incubation, the player scores goals that helps out his parent club. I think it's a corruption of the system, an unintended consequence of having financially doped clubs with squads so big they don't know what to with them.
Click to expand...

i dont think theyre doing anything wrong personally, but i can see how those who dismiss everything rival clubs do could see that.
 
Mumorn said:
he chose everton. He has simply been sent out on loan for experience. At Chelsea with Torres, Ba and Eto'o he was never going to play as many as he would at WBA or Everton. Its how a loan works amazingly.
Click to expand...


none of that changes the fact that Chelsea are making it harder to pick up points against Everton for their rivals, meaning they have an advantage in the title race.

the rules allow it, so Chelsea are well with in their rights to do so - could set a dangerous precedent for the future though
 
billyiddo said:
none of that changes the fact that Chelsea are making it harder to pick up points against Everton for their rivals, meaning they have an advantage in the title race.

the rules allow it, so Chelsea are well with in their rights to do so - could set a dangerous precedent for the future though
Click to expand...

you could say that but then if Chelsea had Lukaku and not Everton, would it be hard for rivals to pick up points against them? Its all ifs and buts really. Chelsea like you say are well within their rights. I dont really think the rules will change either, is anyone else talking about this other than disgruntled spurs fans?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back