Harry saying 'Why should I resign?' and not 'Why would I resign?' is telling. There's absolutely no reason to use the word 'should' there when refuting a story, because it doesn't fit unless the discussions have centred around him leaving already, maybe parting company by mutual consent.
Something is going down, there's too many stories and they haven't been killed yet. Seems like Levy is happy to say 'You have one more year, prove you deserve another, you would have gladly left for England otherwise anyway' and Harry is within his rights to say 'It never really works like that, you either think I'm a good manager or you don't, but we need to get it sorted either way'.
And of course it will end up with Harry going by 'mutual consent' and getting paid off. And it will be a massive shame if it ends up happening like that. Capello resigning, and the Terry racism charge, not only fudged our season but cost us our manager in the long run too, because if that never happened, these discussions would not be taking place. We would be in 3rd, ready for the Champions League next season and Harry would be well up for strengthening the squad for a title push. It's utterly amazing that events that had absolutely nothing to do with us whatsoever have affected the club in such a way, it really is.