awesome dawson
Mitchell Thomas
Mahrez and Barkley are different types of player. This isn't an either or situation.
Sell Sissoko and get both. Our squad needs depth not duds.
Sell Sissoko and get both. Our squad needs depth not duds.
Mahrez and Barkley are different types of player. This isn't an either or situation.
Sell Sissoko and get both. Our squad needs depth not duds.
One exceptional season. Was good the season before that too and was mentioned on here as a potential transfer target that summer.Sissoko is awful; Mahrez is massively over-valued and has one good season.
Barkley has potential and should be at a price where he could be undevalued once Poch has got hold of him
I know which I'd prefer
Agreed on the first paragraph. Not least they naturally play in different positions. Barkley seems at his best in the central AM position, Mahrez naturally plays on the right. For me the right sided position is where we're in more need of cover/competition.Mahrez and Barkley are different types of player. This isn't an either or situation.
Sell Sissoko and get both. Our squad needs depth not duds.
I think we're likely to end up with an unhappy player or two by the end of the season if we sign both. This season we even struggled to get Son on the pitch at times and that was with Lamela out all season.To me, Mahrez is a winger who would give us another dimension. His left foot is quality and whether that's on the right wing cutting in, or on the left delivering decent balls into the box.
Nkoudou isn't up to it IMO. Sell Sissoko and him and get Barkley and Mahrez equates to a significant increase in squad depth quality. Without breaking the bank if Barkley is 25m and Mahrez 30m which seem fair prices.
Mahrez and Barkley are different types of player. This isn't an either or situation.
Sell Sissoko and get both. Our squad needs depth not duds.
Mahrez and Barkley are different types of player. This isn't an either or situation.
Sell Sissoko and get both. Our squad needs depth not duds.
Keep Sissoko and sign two more attacking midfielders? We won't even find a place for Sissoko on our bench.We could (and probably should) get both - but I disagree on selling Sissoko unless it's what Poch wants.
I think we're likely to end up with an unhappy player or two by the end of the season if we sign both. This season we even struggled to get Son on the pitch at times and that was with Lamela out all season.
One younger up and coming player (Nkoudou or someone else) seems like a better balance to me.
So would a fully fit Lamela get PL player of the year? I think not. Yes he downed tools last year, just like everyone else in that Leicester side did. He beats players for fun and adds a creative angle we don't have. I really like Lamela by the way.....I don't rate Mahrez as much as people do, decent he is for sure but I don't think he is much better than a fully fit Lamela.
So would a fully fit Lamela get PL player of the year? I think not. Yes he downed tools last year, just like everyone else in that Leicester side did. He beats players for fun and adds a creative angle we don't have. I really like Lamela by the way.....
Italy is a completely different league, and he didn't even win player of the year in the league there. It's not even about comparing the two anyway. We have enough nice pretty passing type players Lamela being one. We don't have anyone who can beat players one on one on the wing or in central positions then go on to shoot/score. We are desperate for that type of player, consider him a poor mans Bale if you want but he would add quality and that X factor....Mahrez had a great season that was his career highlight to date
Lamella had a very similar season the one before he signed for us
Italy is a completely different league, and he didn't even win player of the year in the league there. It's not even about comparing the two anyway. We have enough nice pretty passing type players Lamela being one. We don't have anyone who can beat players one on one on the wing or in central positions then go on to shoot/score. We are desperate for that type of player, consider him a poor mans Bale if you want but he would add quality and that X factor....
Well Mahrez was deserving of that award, he was brilliant for them. Im not sure if he is flaky, he wasnt any worse than any of the others last year and had shown his quality in previous seasons at Leicester - even in the Championship. He is a realistic target unlike many that are mentioned on here and is a year or two away from his peak yet. Every transfer is a risk, and this is one Id be happy to take....I agree Italy is a different league and was a weak league then too but I stopped have any faith in the player of the year thing when giggs won it here and was gash but got the sentiment vote
I like Mahrez but he has shown he is flaky and we don't do flaky
Previous seasons he was a frequent subWell Mahrez was deserving of that award, he was brilliant for them. Im not sure if he is flaky, he wasnt any worse than any of the others last year and had shown his quality in previous seasons at Leicester - even in the Championship. He is a realistic target unlike many that are mentioned on here and is a year or two away from his peak yet. Every transfer is a risk, and this is one Id be happy to take....
I don't get this "GKN is an out and out winger." A couple of seasons ago Dier was an out and out defender and people were groaning when they heard Poch was readying him to play as a CM. I'm not saying it's going to be the same case with GKN, but I wouldn't be surprised if Poch changed his role to fit our system and he ended up a very useful player that brings pace to the final third. Or even turned him into a very serviceable wingback.Mahrez and GKN are quite different in styles - GKN is an out and out winger for whom pace is his primary asset; Mahrez is someone with tricky rather than pace and plays a lot more centrally that GKN
I don't get this "GKN is an out and out winger." A couple of seasons ago Dier was an out and out defender and people were groaning when they heard Poch was readying him to play as a CM. I'm not saying it's going to be the same case with GKN, but I wouldn't be surprised if Poch changed his role to fit our system and he ended up a very useful player that brings pace to the final third. Or even turned him into a very serviceable wingback.
At this point two years ago there was no evidence that Dier's role would be changed either. All I'm saying is that, based on the Dier example, don't pigeonhole players.There's a whole bunch of things you can come up with using a crystal ball and where there is no evidence. At the moment, whenever GKN has been on the pitch he's hugged the touchline as a winger. There's no evidence that his role might be changed as yet therefore the comment "GKN is an out and out winger" applies
At this point two years ago there was no evidence that Dier's role would be changed either. All I'm saying is that, based on the Dier example, don't pigeonhole players.