• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

I mean in the sense that they thrive at running behind teams into open space. Neither really do well dribbling against set defenders. They are direct wide players, rather than indirect ones (like Odobert say is). The best attacks have a direct vs indirect balance (perhaps one on either side)
Fully agreed. And while Richarlison offers more physicality, hold up play and "chaos" (for good and bad) he's also somewhat in that category imo. He imo doesn't really fix those balance issues, though perhaps with Solanke there we would still get enough balance, not sure.

Odobert in particular, but also Werner offers more balance than Richarlison.
 
I feel that Richarlison was bought to replace Kane, but with Angeball things have moved on.
A forward with better pressing and movement is the way forward, thats what we got and Richarlison will soon be on his way.

The mystery illness is also intriguing. Maybe he is permanently crocked and they want to conceal that.
 
Back