Radu Drăgușin

[Baleforce]

will be great to get him back, him and Danso should be a real solid no fudging around pairing

 

[Raziel]

will be great to get him back, him and Danso should be a real solid no fudging around pairing

With a manager that won't have them constantly running back towards their own goal, outnumbered, would be nice.

Really wouldn't be surprised if the next manager doesn't at least look at 3atb, pretty much everyone in our back line has some experience playing it, and some mix of 3 out of Romero, VDV, Danso, Dragusin could be interesting.

 

[FatBloke]

With a manager that won't have them constantly running back towards their own goal, outnumbered, would be nice.

Really wouldn't be surprised if the next manager doesn't at least look at 3atb, pretty much everyone in our back line has some experience playing it, and some mix of 3 out of Romero, VDV, Danso, Dragusin could be interesting.

Porro, Spence, and Udogie should all be good options as more conventional wingbacks in a back 5.

We'll manage to Spurs it all up somehow though. Sounds like Romero may be off, for a start.

 

[Raziel]

Porro, Spence, and Udogie should all be good options as more conventional wingbacks in a back 5.

We'll manage to Spurs it all up somehow though. Sounds like Romero may be off, for a start.

I actually think Porro, Udogie, Romero, Danso, Dragusin, maybe even VDV have all actually played in that system.

I'd rather Romero stays but if he isn't committed, we should move him on, get some cash, spend where we need most.

 

[Gutter Boy]

With a manager that won't have them constantly running back towards their own goal, outnumbered, would be nice.

Really wouldn't be surprised if the next manager doesn't at least look at 3atb, pretty much everyone in our back line has some experience playing it, and some mix of 3 out of Romero, VDV, Danso, Dragusin could be interesting.

3 at the back is a dog brick formation. Too defensive and yet defenders hate playing it.

You are basically playing a CB instead of a CM, so losing ballplaying capacity and possession/competitiveness in the most important part of the pitch.

 

[Muttley]

3 at the back is a dog brick formation. Too defensive and yet defenders hate playing it.

You are basically playing a CB instead of a CM, so losing ballplaying capacity and possession/competitiveness in the most important part of the pitch.

Not with inverted wing-backs

 

[glorygloryeze]

3 at the back is a dog brick formation. Too defensive and yet defenders hate playing it.

You are basically playing a CB instead of a CM, so losing ballplaying capacity and possession/competitiveness in the most important part of the pitch.

I don't think it too defensive at all. Just depends on how comfortable your defenders are on the ball and in tight spaces. Then if your wing backs have great stamina and touch it gives you great flexibility to switch from defence to attack (and vice versa).

Inter are solid but not defensive per say