SpurMeUp
Les Howe
I understand all of that, which is why my immediate thought was "why not?", but as others have said, it sets a very dangerous precedent. And THAT I dont agree with.
At that point it is not about the subject, it is about what it means to be able to re-do any votes until a supposed preferred answer can be had.
We just had a general election a couple of years after the previous one...was that a very dangerous precedent? Or are you biased towards retaining the original result? No harm in admitting that.