glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
But staying is already defined.
As in staying = "become just a region in the new EU Superstate under an EU President"; hence the leave vote
But staying is already defined.
And what if everything proceeds as you suggest and then, two years later, there's another financial crisis, another migrant crisis, a military skirmish of some point, and suddenly polls are showing that 60% of the country want to leave again?
There has to come a point where it's settled. Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems from your post that you think that point arrives as soon as the country agrees on your viewpoint. That's when we put it to bed.
As in staying = "become just a region in the new EU Superstate under an EU President"; hence the leave vote
Please note there no assumptions about you. Random examples. Interesting to hear about your own reasons though. We're all Spurs fans first and foremost.
Personally I would probably be better off in a Leave scenario, but I believe it would be a step backwards for the UK. But that is guess work because none of us know what Brexit will be - not even our government! It could range from turning the UK into a tax haven with ultra free trade (the Tory dream) to a situation very similar to today.
To sign off Leaving or Remaining in the EU because it's become an ingrained position would be a shame. Everyone should have the chance to see exactly what's on the table, what we the UK will get, and express our wishes. By definition no one has done that yet.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Please note there no assumptions about you. Random examples. Interesting to hear about your own reasons though. We're all Spurs fans first and foremost.
Personally I would probably be better off in a Leave scenario, but I believe it would be a step backwards for the UK. But that is guess work because none of us know what Brexit will be - not even our government! It could range from turning the UK into a tax haven with ultra free trade (the Tory dream) to a situation very similar to today.
To sign off Leaving or Remaining in the EU because it's become an ingrained position would be a shame. Everyone should have the chance to see exactly what's on the table, what we the UK will get, and express our wishes. By definition no one has done that yet.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Well as it stands we decide if we want more integration or not. Just like we decided we didnt want to join the Euro or schezen (spelling) zone.
We also have influence on Eus policy direction with our vote holding veto just like every other state I believe.
If you don't mind tell me how you will be better off?
I keep asking this to leave voters but none have given me an answer that has any kind of substance.
So I thought I will ask you a remainder to see some upside.
The people decided in the referendum that overall e didn't want more integration, plus more besides. So all good for me thus far
may i ask you as an ardent remainer how brexit will affect you personally? What is worrying you the most
What has the migrant crisis or the financial crisis got to do with the EU?
Are you serious? You're saying that you don't think that the migrant crisis had any bearing on the referendum outcome, or that any continuing or future such issues would influence public opinion or a future vote on the matter? Similarly for any of a variety of financial instability that might affect the EU?
I have spoken to quite a few leave voters and the reason they voted leave has much more to do with austerity the results of the financial crisis and the conservatives, then it has to do with any EU policy.
But that's obviously not the case for all leave voters.
Like I said let's have a proper informed vote, and if leave wins that... then ok I'm on board.
No promise of Unicorns or conversely Armageddon just properly accountable statements about what leaving would mean.
No, what I'm saying is that neither the financial or migrant crisis started in or was started by the EU. You could look at America and to a lesser extent the UK for the root causes of both those Crisis.
Personally, i thought the referendum WAS decently informed; yes there was a lot of guff from both sides, but that was like any other general election debate.
The difference is that this vote was a once-in-a-lifetime one that many, many people already had a view on anyway, though of course there was a certain chunk of the population that were thinking about the EU and the implications of leaving/staying for the first time.
I think this idea that the vote 'wasn't informed' is the type coming from those being labelled these days as "Remoaners" and frankly, those people keep showing why that term keeps being used.
I actually, think if we had another debate/vote, the leave vote would actually be higher due to the things the EU bigwigs have been saying in public since..
If you believe that leave would actually get more of majority... fine let's have another referendum when we know what we are voting for and let's settle the matter
As long as the parameters are that the UK are leaving and it's just a case of how, then i don't mind
Well if that's the only option, then I will take that. But why not give people the opportunity to change their mind? Especially if you think that the leave vote will be even more convincing... therefore shutting up us remoaners innit
Whatever; it's not me constantly bringing it up and claiming "the vote was dodgy" or "people didn't know what they were voting for" etc etc...
Don't worry, many are trying to scupper the process of the UK leaving the EU anyway, so the "remoaners" will likely get their wish in the end
Ok so we agree... another vote it is