Grays_1890
Chris Jones
Let's see indeed. Would you care to place a charity bet that we don't/do leave the EU on the 31st of october as Boris said?
I bet that on the 31st October we leave the EU
Let's see indeed. Would you care to place a charity bet that we don't/do leave the EU on the 31st of october as Boris said?
I bet that on the 31st October we leave the EU
Okay awesome. £10 to a charity of the winners choosing?
Yeh more than happy to
You know why, we are promising that there are other solutions. The government and the EU know its bollox, they are calling our bluff.
It's a bit of fun, and a tenner for a good cause out of the current political circus.
No -If we were confident there was a solution the backstop would be irrelevant. We are threatening No deal / WTO - that involves building a border.Of course there's other solutions - just accept equivalence. The whole thing is designed to trap the UK permanently in the Eurosphere, to neutralise most of the benefits of Brexit. The EU is the only one threatening to build a border
The main goal of the backstop is to prevent a part of the UK descending back into sectarian violence, and destroying an international treaty in the process. The spin that it is a dasterly EU trap is ERG propaganda for the guilible. The EU have offered aNI only backstop, so not much of a trap really, is it?Of course there's other solutions - just accept equivalence. The whole thing is designed to trap the UK permanently in the Eurosphere, to neutralise most of the benefits of Brexit. The EU is the only one threatening to build a border
And those actions successfully bought the rampant inflation, caused by Labour and their union masters, under control.
We don't need a border because there's already the 100 year old common travel area. The only people calling for a border are the EU, to do their pointless 'tests' on goods. If they accept UK standards as equivalent to EU ones, that solves everythingThe main goal of the backstop is to prevent a part of the UK descending back into sectarian violence, and destroying an international treaty in the process. The spin that it is a dasterly EU trap is ERG propaganda for the guilible. The EU have offered aNI only backstop, so not much of a trap really, is it?
Describe your alternative solution that has managed to elude everyone so far?
how does that work when we are importing from all over the globe? American Chicken competing with EU drug free chicken, Mexican beef etc.We don't need a border because there's already the 100 year old common travel area. The only people calling for a border are the EU, to do their pointless 'tests' on goods. If they accept UK standards as equivalent to EU ones, that solves everything
Pointless tests? That's your solution. Just fudge it. I'm guessing you are on a wind up.We don't need a border because there's already the 100 year old common travel area. The only people calling for a border are the EU, to do their pointless 'tests' on goods. If they accept UK standards as equivalent to EU ones, that solves everything
From what I've read if Boris wants it there's now no way to actually stop no deal, even if there's a vote of no confidence then Boris gets to set the date of a general election as PM which he could do after 31 October. It seems the only way out would be via a unity government if one could be agreed to get an extension ahead of a general election.
We don't need a border because there's already the 100 year old common travel area. The only people calling for a border are the EU, to do their pointless 'tests' on goods. If they accept UK standards as equivalent to EU ones, that solves everything
The Common Travel Area has nothing to do with trade though does it?
It is a freedom of movement concept (much like the one Brexiteers want rid of for the rest of the EU - is that cos the Irish are 'us' so OK whilst Eastern Europeans are 'other' so undesirable?)
I meant you don't need a border for people, so the only purpose of the border is to check goods, which with any ounce of goodwill/effort to not be punitive could easily be done at the importer/exporter premises
The CTA was a bespoke solution created to deal with Irish partition. I'm pretty sure it will end when Ireland is reunified. Imagine if the EU would allow similar creativity to solve a unique short-to-medium term situation
People are not the real problem. They have passports.I meant you don't need a border for people, so the only purpose of the border is to check goods, which with any ounce of goodwill/effort to not be punitive could easily be done at the importer/exporter premises
The CTA was a bespoke solution created to deal with Irish partition. I'm pretty sure it will end when Ireland is reunified. Imagine if the EU would allow similar creativity to solve a unique short-to-medium term situation
Who would actively 'want no deal'? It's not what was campaigned for, voted for, or in anyone's intersts. It is something that has evolved as a supposed option as the other Brexit options were understood (as being worse than staying in the eu). No one but no one campaigned or promised no deal. It was going to be easy to get a deal if I rember correctly.
If you can be bothered to be rational and look at what no deal really means - you'd come to the conclusion it is the worst of all options for the UK. There probably wouldn't be a united kingdom by the end of it. We'd lose jobs and all become poorer. That's not scaremongering. Even Boris understands the pain no deal would cause. He's banking on the bluff getting a deal. But will it?