ricky2tricky4city
Luka Modric
I think we can all guess which expenditure by KCC is going to receive the most scrutiny.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)
- Thread starter SpurMeUp
- Start date
SpiderSpurs
Espen Baardsen
You sound a little sceptical, waste of time in your opinion?
Glenda's Legs
Ian Walker
I don't think it's ever a waste of time to track expenditure and remove unnecessary or duplicative costs, as long as there's a clear understanding of why that expenditure is there in the first place.
But this is just performative. They already know what they want to find imo (including DEI costs, immigration-related costs, and so on) - I don't for one moment believe they will be doing a true analysis of value for money across contracted suppliers and service providers.
And when they find they can't get all the info they want, probably for good reason, they'll cry foul play.
True but they are investing a fair bit and even then there's reforms they could go ahead with. Not saying these are earth shattering but lots of little things add up. Just frustrating that they're not showing more ambition when they have such a large majority and a country that in the main would embrace some bigger changes.