@DubaiSpur i posted this yesterday.....
You must realise two things dictate team selection....injuries and objectives.
We were going for the league last season also safe in the knowledge that CL qualification was a nailed on consolation (hence f*cking off the EL last year). Same team, a single focus = league.
Injuries have largely forced us to change the team (and system) this year. The objective being the league and secondary the CL league group. The other night showed that any hint of doing well in the CL has evaporated as an objective (probably well before we kicked off in Monaco) and all thoughts were focused on the league.
We will have an objective to do well in the EL. 1 because it is a feasible route into the CL and 2 because the PL does look challenging this year. We dont start in the EL until mid feb and the objective will be assessed round by round ( we could have f*cked the league by feb??)
You might not like it. (i dont particuarly) BUT you have to accept it.
Levy likes it, and he likes Poch because he accepts it.
And too add......
Sadly (from a glorious football perspective) it is very business driven. Targets, objectives, masterplans.
The main objective is CL qualification,(end of) because of the money it brings.
A net spend on transfers if we can. Focus on young players that can be developed and if they turn out seriously good sell them for massive profit (realistically we still cant keep these players).
We can run a good team (just like Monaco, Lever, A.Madrid) because we do buy well (sorry if its not 100% strike rate) and we have a manger that is talented (BUT young) and can organise a team and get it to be competitive in a very tough market. As the OP points out 5 big teams are way ahead of us in expenditure and all are managed by world top 10 managers.
Its very emotionless by definition, so contrary to what we as glory glory tottenham fans know and love. We want the swashbuckling, humdinger games and the chase for silverware.
Levy (and Poch) have a plan. A top table team in the best stadium in europe. That is a massive task given its's full of uncontrollables, uneven playing fields and bumps in the road. But that overall objective is set.
The stadium will cost a fortune. Levy is working his arse off to try and get other people to pay for it. Poch is helping with this.
Emotion will only knock you off course or waiver. It's hard (as a fan) because it is a long road.
As i said above you might not like it BUT you have to accept it. Its the only way to get where we want to. It could be boring, it will do your head in BUT if we get there it will be one of the greatest business AND footballing acheivements in history.
I stick with it because i believe in Levy and Poch as two of the best people we could have on board.
To do it organically and on our terms will rightfully gives us carte blanche to lourd it over all and sundry.
I accept it, mate - difficult not to accept it, really, since my opinion on the matter isn't worth a damn.
However, it will continually disappoint me, is all - for me, I fell in love with the Tottenham Hotspur that we *aspire* to be, that we strive to live up to. I fell in love with a side that embodied swashbuckling style, aggression, ambition, relentless innovation and a drive to never let the mundane interfere with the glorious, wherever and whenever they played. I fell in love with Danny Blanchflower and Bill Nic's paternal admonishments from the past, floated down through history and emblazoned today on the grand blue and white hoardings around the Lane.
I know, deep down, that Levy probably shares that love, and that ambition - Poch possibly at least shares the latter. But it will never cease to disappoint me that, in the present moment, we choose to ignore the real meaning that those hoardings are trying to convey while still putting them up there and defining ourselves by them - and, equally, it disappoints me that a man like Poch, who has *everything* still to prove in the wider footballing world, doesn't buy in to that as wholly as he is capable of doing. Trophies are what this club is built upon, it's what separates us from the chancers like West Ham who also pretend to our status as innovators and cultural touchstones in English footballing history - we followed our principles *and* have the rich history to show for it. We have opportunities every year to go for more such foundational moments. And I can't be convinced that our continual refusal to do so is beneficial to us - thus, I'll always be disappointed. I accept it, because that's the way the club has decided to go. But I'll continually be disappointed by it, and by every manager that decides to follow the zeitgeist and place league results over our shots at ending our growing trophy drought.
Firstly, let me say that I don't think that our opinions / analyses are too far apart from each other - I think maybe you just tend to focus on the negative in your posts, which leads to me emphasise the positive for the sake of balance
To reply just on the Monaco / Leverkeusen point: Of course I didn't mean to suggest that results are totally dictated by expenditure. I meant that for us I think there's this more
specific and
systematic issue that we spend less money than 5 other domestic clubs, but year-on-year are expected to compete with them, and more often-than-not fail to, and that this has a more entrenched and long-term impact on the club's mindset and mentality. And that this pressure has contributed to a dip in confidence amongst the players during our awful patch of recent form, including the CL.
Also worth saying that both Monaco and Leverkeusen have more recent experience of CL than us, and less competitive environments in their domestic leagues, both of which might arguably have reduced the pressure on them in the CL in comparison to us (and so mitigated the difference in wage expenditure to some extent).
So I think there are other factors that
exacerbate our domestic competitors' extra spending over ours, and other factors that
mitigate our extra spending over our CL rivals.
Still, as I said, not personally trying to suggest that Poch and the players shouldn't be subjected to valid and constructive criticism. Indeed there's a few Poch decisions I disagree with (playing Dier at CB, changing to the diamond formation, rotating for CL rather than vice versa). Just trying to put things into perspective.
No, we don't really disagree, we're just seeing the different half-full/half-empty sides of the cup. Overall, Monaco and Leverkusen are, despite their experience in the CL, still roughly comparable to us in terms of where they are in their respective leagues, what their position is relative to the title favorites in the Bundesliga and Ligue 1 respectively, and so on. Indeed, Leverkusen in particular are often called 'Neverkusen' because of how frequently they screw up unassailable leads and snach defeat from the jaws of victory when they're chasing trophies and titles - sound familiar?
I would also disagree that Leverkusen's domestic environment in particular is less competitive than ours - relative to their rivals, they're in the same position as us, with Dortmund and Bayern expected to challenge every season and outspend everyone else, a range of smaller clubs expected to compete for CL football (Wolfsburg, Schalke and so on), and the league as a whole growing increasingly competitive with underdogs frequently upsetting traditional favorites (see Hertha last season and Leipzig/Koln/Frankfurt this season for proof of this). Still, they were able to beat us with some ease, which concerns me since we're still financially stronger than them to the point where we snatched their best player (Son) from them without even having CL football to offer him.
I don't disagree with your desire to put things in perspective (and, indeed, I agree with enough of your points to happily 'like' your post
), but that exacerbation of domestic disadvantages and mitigation of European advantages seems to me to be a bit overblown - we're not as badly off as that, which raises expectations in terms of our performances that Poch and the lads have failed to meet. Thus, honest, open self-criticism, improvement and self-examination is needed, is all.