so what do you call what we do?
Run a business. Spend within our means.
so what do you call what we do?
Run a business. Spend within our means.
but our means is down to our assets and dont get it twisted, before we got to this point where we could do that we had to put out a decent outlay to get players in..., think about it, what assets did we truly have to get the difference makers in?now we rotate players in and out in an upward spiral while still doing what big teams do but on a lower tier...all the while shipping off players that dont make the grade
so we do the same , we just dont buy everyone that has legs
We do what we do within our means, just like Arsenal do to be fair for them. We haven't done the real life equivalent of using a cheat code to get our relative success. We are where we are because of legitimate business practices, good investments, clever decision making and excellent strategic planning.
If we had any assets it was because that was our standing as a club and we were entitled to use them. Emirates Marketing Project got given a winning lottery ticket and used that. Way different. But I'm sure you know that?
The difference to me is where the money comes from. The money that we (and Arse) spend comes from the fans, who pay exorbitant prices to support their team. The money that City/Chelsea spend comes from a sugardaddy owner, and yet their fans crow about their success and mega-signings as if *they* were personally responsible for them.
It's like the difference between a person who's rich because he/she works hard and is blessed with marketable talent and intelligence, versus some kid who's rich because of their mummy and daddy or a gold-digger who marries a wealthy old guy for money. Being rich isn't the issue here, and nor is spending (and wasting) a lot of money. I could not care less what people do with their own money...the issue is whether the money you spend to gain success is actually "your" money - that is, something you've earned yourself.
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiership-transfers/tottenham-hotspur-transfers.html
how far back can we go with transfers? anyone got a link to some seeeeerious historic moves we did?
accounting for inflation some of the Net spending we did in the early part of this millennium and the last 20th century must surely be huge....
edit:- actually those figures mean nothing.........even if we spent that on transfers that doesnt account for gate receipts and merchandising and sponsorships etc etc
we could very well have been earning that money.
i still maintain that we do similar to what city do but on a significantly smaller scale , with higher risk but spread out / minimised as much as possible
[/B]
That is the point is n't it? We don't go out and blow a ~£1 billion in less than 5 years. Generally we buy "rough diamonds " and polish them up rather the finished articles likes of Sergio Aguerro, Fernando Torres or Robin Van Persie. Our top spend on a player is less than Aston Villa spent on Darren Bent. Our wages to turnover ration is also less than Villa. It's what I love about Daniel Levy, we operate in a hyper inflated market ( Bristol Rovers, in league 2 have a wage bill of £18 million ), yet he keeps us competitive both on and off the field. If we were remotely like Emirates Marketing Project we would have bought a trophy years ago. I understand that you want to make a point about posters seeing bad in everything HR says or does but to say we are like City is plain wrong.
fair enough, we dont throw money at the situation to the extent that city do i agree. i think that was me going a few steps waaay to far to prove a point.......
hypotheticaly speaking though .... isnt us not doing a city because we cant afford it? we arent as rich so we dont do it......what we can do is speculate on a purchase and take a gamble....but thats the area we can afford.....whereas other teams cant afford to do the same.
even in recent years the way we operated was to take the best of the rest that were not wanted by the big clubs in hopes of bridging the gap between us and them.....we did this season after season......because we could afford to do it, other teams couldnt compete with us within thAT sub section of the market...and we just kept on buying and buying and buying till we cut out the ones that didnt make the grade and kept the rest
this thing is all relative, the question is if ENIC had sheik type disposable income....would they keep to this structure that they have or not?
i will say though that the wage bill control is definately a sign of a big differential between us and city...especially as it is linked to profits and revenue
QPR boss Harry Redknapp reckons his former club Tottenham have enough quality to field two sides capable of challenging at the top of the Premier League.
Redknapp welcomes the club that sacked him at the end of last season to Loftus Road on Saturday and has watched his successor, Andre Villas-Boas, guide them to third in the table.
Survival, by contrast, is the challenge at Loftus Road and Redknapp knows the league's bottom-placed side face a tough task to make his the game a memorable reunion for him.
"Spurs could field two teams who could compete in the Premier League," he told the Evening Standard.
Live on Sky Sports
vs
QPR v Tottenham
January 12, 2013 12:00pm
Remote Record
"They have a second team who would hold their own at the top level without any problem. For a start, they have five top-class centre-backs.
"They can afford to let Danny Rose go to Sunderland on loan because they have people like Benoit Assou-Ekotto, Kyle Naughton and Kyle Walker in the squad. They have loads of top-class midfielders.
"They're full of quality everywhere. It's a similar group to the one I left but then Mousa Dembele has gone in and done well. They have an outstanding group of players, no doubt about that."
"Not many people walk away from a club as popular as I was at that time. Normally when you leave a football club, you go out with the fans shouting for you to go but I never had that."
Harry Redknapp
Quotes of the week
Redknapp had guided Spurs to their second fourth-placed finish in three campaigns before he was dismissed, but denies any ill-feeling towards his former employers.
"It will be strange but time moves on and I have no bad feelings towards Tottenham," he added.
"I don't live my life like that. I had a great time there, I loved the fans and they were great to me.
"Not many people walk away from a club as popular as I was at that time. Normally when you leave a football club, you go out with the fans shouting for you to go but I never had that. The people treated me absolutely brilliantly."
You notice the article mentions 'top of the premier league, but Redknapp says nothing of the sort. He just says that they could compete in the top division.
Shoddy journalism.