• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OT: What next for Harry?

My main gripe with Harry's management methods is that it's all about the now. He uses and discards players instead of trying to improve the ones he has. That's fine if you don't mind a conveyorbelt of journeymen and have infinite funds to pay agents with.
 
My main gripe with Harry's management methods is that it's all about the now. He uses and discards players instead of trying to improve the ones he has. That's fine if you don't mind a conveyorbelt of journeymen and have infinite funds to pay agents with.

Eh???.West Ham,ferdinad,lampard,cole,defoe all brought through.

His job specification with us at the begining is exactly the same he's got to do at qpr,to survive and get results.
 
Eh???.West Ham,ferdinad,lampard,cole,defoe all brought through.

His job specification with us at the begining is exactly the same he's got to do at qpr,to survive and get results.

They all came through and they played because they were that good. Credit should go to their academy IMO.
 
You can't help but worried about having to face too many of our ex managers. We have already met Hughton's Norwich twice, drawing once and losing once. Now, we still have to face Hughton once, Jol twice and Redknapp once. We have to be carefull in those matches as they don't need motivation to spoil it for us.
 
He's breathtaking.
Rather than come in and protect them, he has made sure that everyone knows exactly who's fault this is from the get-go, and he will continue to repeat what the side wasn't doing before his arrival. He is teflon, seriously. This way he can always say that he was very clear from the get-go that it was a massive mess which would've required extraordinary things if they don't survive, and if they do, well, he can claim it as his 'best success yet' and revel in the 'glory' of doing a 'fantastic' job.

He has not changed, he has made a career of blaming others for his failings and he is already starting at QPR. Lets not forget he wrote the book on excuses.
 
I could ask you the same question steff. I mean you constantly claim posters bringing up Redknapp all the time is tedious yet you never ignore it neither so we're both guilty of the same thing.

Why did you bold the sentence about him not giving a brick btw?

Oh and Steff as i said to you before the cheerleader is hanging on every word you say again and is accusing me of something based solely on your post. It's just so so predictable it's funny now.

You have a fair point. Now he's 'back' I cannot help it. What I won't do is compare him to who's managing our club if I can help myself. But fair cop, guilty! BTW the bold face about not give a brick, yeah, I was going to point out that he has never given a brick about us, but forgot to put that in there LOL...
 
Well of course there's a hundred options but i'm interested in peoples preference out of those two.

But that's not affair comparison. You know that. Everyone will go for a win in the context you're putting it. But the truth is if yo keep going with the pizza route, you'll end up losing much more an you win. As for individual performances, I cannot believe that people are not seeing the difference in Bale this season...maybe they are? Hope so...
 
Eh???.West Ham,ferdinad,lampard,cole,defoe all brought through.

His job specification with us at the begining is exactly the same he's got to do at qpr,to survive and get results.

Mate...talk to some spammers (old schoolers not the new tossers)...Billy Bonds had a lot to do with that. Harry came in and fudged him off out of there. Of course he helped the club and the players, but they had already been 'sewn' so to speak...it's why Brookng (a proper gentleman in very sense) hates Harry (his treatment if Bonds)...

BTW the youth coach was Tony Carr...he brought them through when Bonds was manager...
 
Harry did a brilliant job for us thats not even debateable however.......second half of last season was a disaster yes we had a tough run of games but the stoke norwich home and qpr away games we almost looked beaten as we walked on the pitch something either wasnt all hunky dorey in backround or harrys supposed 'man management skills' and his apparent brilliance to geeing players up were non existent.
 
BTW the youth coach was Tony Carr...he brought them through when Bonds was manager...

What's in a name? Graham Carr was a good scout with us and now is doing good things with Saudi Sportswashing Machine. His son, of course, took a different route.
 
This is when I really, really wish Harry Redknapp would have taken the England job. This time last year I was dreading the words 'England job' but I'd rather him make England good more than anyone else other than Spurs, and he's just gonna try and take a good few of our players now. Mark my words, QPR will not be considered a mug team next season.
 
This is when I really, really wish Harry Redknapp would have taken the England job. This time last year I was dreading the words 'England job' but I'd rather him make England good more than anyone else other than Spurs, and he's just gonna try and take a good few of our players now. Mark my words, QPR will not be considered a mug team next season.


Sure, they'll likely be considered one of the best in their league.
 
Sure, they'll likely be considered one of the best in their league.

We could have been relegated too before Redknapp took over. QPR's players are far too good for where they are in the league, and in fact in my opinion they have a better squad than what we had when Redknapp took over.
 
We could have been relegated too before Redknapp took over. QPR's players are far too good for where they are in the league, and in fact in my opinion they have a better squad than what we had when Redknapp took over.


I disagree, we had a good team that had some bad results. There has been nothing to show that QPR have a good team, quite the opposite imo.


Very few of them have played with each other for very long. It takes a while for them to actually become a team, which is time they do not have.
 
I disagree, we had a good team that had some bad results. There has been nothing to show that QPR have a good team, quite the opposite imo.


Very few of them have played with each other for very long. It takes a while for them to actually become a team, which is time they do not have.

No we had some real brick when Redknapp took over. If we had that team today I'd easily take quite a few of QPR's players. Whilst they may not have proven themselves yet, I still feel they have quite a lot of potential that they haven't shown the world yet, that Harry will bring out as he always does.
 
No we had some real brick when Redknapp took over. If we had that team today I'd easily take quite a few of QPR's players. Whilst they may not have proven themselves yet, I still feel they have quite a lot of potential that they haven't shown the world yet, that Harry will bring out as he always does.


Your mistaking good players for a good team. They're not the same thing.


Good players are good in isolation. Good teams are teams where the players know each other well and know how to play together. A manager cannot get the players to understand each others games faster, that only comes after playing time.


QPR's team has not been together long enough for this to happen, it is what happens when you buy 7-10 players during a single transfer window.
 
Back