alekaras
The ITK of IDK
No, Wolves really shouldn't have scored 2. It would have been grossly unlucky for us if they had. I'm struggling to remember a clear cut chance that they created.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
*** OMT - Tottenham vs Wolves ***
- Thread starter glorygloryeze
- Start date
tommysvr
Vedran Corluka
It's the Premier League. You're not winning every match 4-0. Liverpool have 2 points from draws with Fulham and Palace.
Gazza Dazzla
Chris Perry
The header that missed the post at the end of the first half, but that was a half chance really, he did well to get it close.
We had an xg of 1.7 while theirs was 0.6.
Baleforce
Arthur Rowe
that’s because they are brick
alekaras
The ITK of IDK
Exactly.
We deserved the win yesterday and had the better chances over the course of the game.
Yiddo
Jack Jull
If you are happy with our performances in the last 2 games then that is good for you.
No I'm not but i don't confuse not playing well with not deserving to win/pick up points.
You said we were lucky to win, we weren't.
Yiddo
Jack Jull
We were, Wolves put a couple just past the post and should have scored when Jimenez practically walked through our whole defence.
demotw
Nicola Berti
Think people should look at all the results across the board before focusing on our performances - Leeds putting 3 past Chelsea, Liverpool drawing first 2, City 2-1 down at Saudi Sportswashing Machine (at time of writing) and them lot actually winning 3 in a row. Takes a month or so for teams to get into strides and find some consistency, for signings to embed and to review how teams are playing with the new signings. We are doing ok, wolves result and performance was good and rusty as expected but we picking up results, let’s see how we step up.
Shots that were close aren't the same as good chances - i don't think either of those were particularly glaring misses
Yiddo
Jack Jull
Are you actually having a laugh? How are close shots any different to good chances?
Xg measure how good a chance was. We had an xg of 1.7, they had an xg of 0.6. We had the better chances.
I'll take it to an extreme to make the point - someone pulls off a cracking shot from 50 yards out that just sails past the post. Now that was a shot that was close to going in but not a great chance to score from
In fairness it doesn't measure shots off target, but I'm confident if the chances he is talking about were on target they wouldn't have drastically changed the xg rating of the game, neither were gilt edged chances
Didn't realise that. Thats a bit brick.
Yiddo
Jack Jull
Xg is pointless in my opinion.
Yiddo
Jack Jull
If they were on target they were in the goal.