no, it's not
It doesn't matter what fans argue we are always bias. The interpretation is now if your hand is in an unnatural position and you gain an advantage, it is deliberate. If you watch Sanchez, his arms are above his head when the ball hits his arm. The arms are in an unnatural position and he gained an advantage by them being in that position. Therefore by the IFAB interpretation that was a penalty.also, I bet that had Sanchez kicked it against Son at the other end nobody would be arguing with the no penalty call
I think it would be.
That's why you see them given when players raise their arms in the wall to 'protect themselves'.
To me deliberate and intentional is the same, but that's maybe because English isn't my first language, and there are some subtle nuances that I don't know of. What I mean and what you wrote is the same.the rule isn't based on intent, it's based on the hand deliberatly being used to intercept the flight of the ball
if they worded the law to something like "moved arm with intent to impede the ball" then yes it would be a foul
the laws of the game are probably the most studied text in human history, it's taken over a hundred years to distill this law to its current wording
the cheer when we got the penalty was louder than when Kane actually scored it.
Redknapp is Liverpool as far as I'm concerned.What do you mean "at a push". He played for Spurs for GHod sake.
Redknapp is Liverpool as far as I'm concerned.
Yeah, I'm referring to bias.Maybe so but he's still an ex Spurs player. He's no less an ex Spurs player than Gareth Bale is now or Luka Modrc/Berbatov etc. For the most part I think he's quite fair about Spurs, yes he tells some home truths about us selling our best players in the past but what do people want him to say? We didn't actually sell Modric and Bale for big money, they're still Spurs players, it's just the media and everyone else is lying to us that they moved to Real Madrid. It's not like he's Jason Cundy who clearly doesn't like us and seems to have forgotten that he played for us and we paid his wages.
Yeah, I'm referring to bias.
Liverpool over Spurs. I'd say that panel represented Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool.Bias against Spurs of for Liverpool?
Liverpool over Spurs. I'd say that panel represented Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool.
Dude I'm not doubting that for a second, I don't need quotes!!!
Maybe so but he's still an ex Spurs player. He's no less an ex Spurs player than Gareth Bale is now or Luka Modrc/Berbatov etc. For the most part I think he's quite fair about Spurs, yes he tells some home truths about us selling our best players in the past but what do people want him to say? We didn't actually sell Modric and Bale for big money, they're still Spurs players, it's just the media and everyone else is lying to us that they moved to Real Madrid. It's not like he's Jason Cundy who clearly doesn't like us and seems to have forgotten that he played for us and we paid his wages.
Maybe so but he's still an ex Spurs player. He's no less an ex Spurs player than Gareth Bale is now or Luka Modrc/Berbatov etc. For the most part I think he's quite fair about Spurs, yes he tells some home truths about us selling our best players in the past but what do people want him to say? We didn't actually sell Modric and Bale for big money, they're still Spurs players, it's just the media and everyone else is lying to us that they moved to Real Madrid. It's not like he's Jason Cundy who clearly doesn't like us and seems to have forgotten that he played for us and we paid his wages.
Watched Arsenal TV last month and Cundy was interviewed in a Chelsea shirt. He did predict that we would finish above Arse though.
Michael Cox covers some of what we were discussing about the fluidity of our formation in his column today.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ier-versatility-tottenham-flexibility-arsenal
22 years of them finishing above us and they even invented a day for it yet we're small time for celebrating finishing above them hahahaah