DeanoAustin
Jimmy McCormick
Not his usual self is he. We've lost games before and he's not been like that
It’s an obvious and fair question too. Bizarre reaction.
Not his usual self is he. We've lost games before and he's not been like that
Once again, it’s up to the club to manage who deserves a pay increase and who doesn’t. Just because one player gets a pay increase doesn’t mean you have to do it for the entire squad. If we’re going to continually use this argument then we’ll never sign players for fear of upsetting anyone who earns slightly less, or a lot less.
If it makes you feel better, Pool were coasting and PSG were nowhere... then Salah gave the ball away and PSG sprinted right down the middle and scored without a challenge for 2-2
You do have to give them more if you want them to be happy, or if you don't want them any reason for their agent to kick up a fuss in the next transfer window / contract negotiation time. Because it will happen. And the reason it doesn't happen often is because most clubs get it. Every club has a structure. City right now easily have the money to give Sterling 220k a week like his agent is demanding, but they don't want to do it. Not because they can't, but because they view him at a certain level in their scale and he views himself otherwise.
To take it the opposite way, we offered Trippier a big pay increase after we sold Walker. Not because he had done anything amazing to deserve it beyond being a good back up, but because we knew he was going to be playing more in that coming season. It was proactive, and it reflected his appropriate worth in the squad. I'm sure he wouldn't have kicked up a fuss and was simply relishing his chance to play more, but we appropriately reflected his worth.
What we absolutely can't do though, is offer someone who would be our 5th or 6th most important player the highest wages.
Interesting post though a couple points I would strongly debate:
- "But long term, are those things going to help us above City and United?"
- "I'm waiting for the point where we operate on a closer financial footing to our rivals"
I dont think we're ever expecting to be consistently above the two Manchester clubs...and really our 'rivals' are Liverpool, Arse and to some extent Cheatski (given that they seem to being less bankrolled by the Russian).
I believe Levy's aim is 4th every season, which isnt a bad aim if you accept that Man U and Man C are far far richer. However I worry that he's been lulled into a false sense of security as a result of Poch's achievements. Our transfer activity - both incomings and outgoings - this summer was awful and exacerbated by the world cup...but we knew about the world cup and the number of our player which would be involved.
If it makes you feel better, Pool were coasting and PSG were nowhere... then Salah gave the ball away and PSG sprinted right down the middle and scored without a challenge for 2-2
Who is saying we have to do that? We gave Kane a big pay rise in the summer, well deserved after 4 seasons of being the best striker in the league (stats wise). He is the highest paid player because he is our best player. If the club were scared of hurting everyone else's feelings then they wouldn't get very far and they wouldn't have given Kane a big wage increase.
If it makes you feel better, Pool were coasting and PSG were nowhere... then Salah gave the ball away and PSG sprinted right down the middle and scored without a challenge for 2-2
Inevitable, they fold like a cheap suit if you actually kick the ball toward their goal.
Pool just got sliced wide open but Draxler's shot hit a defender... if he had buried this good chance, it would be SO sexy, but he didn't. SO LIVERPOOLY*lumps on 'pool winner*
I completely think Levy wants us competing with the Manchesters. It won't happen overnight and takes a lot of smart thought and long term planning, but I think he wants us there.
This idea that Levy just wants 4th is nonsense and has no basis. I saw a Tweet tonight that said he'd rather come 4th on 50M profit then 2nd on 20M profit. Takes like this just show such a fundamental ignorance of the business of football and it really shows those people up.
I think his overall goal is to get our infrastructure to a point where we are able to consistently compete with bigger clubs, but I think we will sell the club to owners that have a better skill set to manage one of the biggest projects. Levy and ENIC create value out of undercooked potential. And it's a great skill set to have, and is perfect for our needs right now. But, I would say that when we have the infrastructure of a bigger club, we may need someone at the head of the table who has the skillset to run a best in class commercial operation, has the network with all the super agents, and a financial strategy that means we speculate to accumulate a little more. Right now we don't do that and I think it is right, given where we are at and what we need to build towards. But ultimately we will need to spend more when we have the infrastructure to support it. It's just a journey of getting there and I trust Levy as the best man to get us to that point.
They do
Their actually quite spineless
SO LIVERPOOLY, Firmino
If that was a manager of another club I'd say he's losing the plot. Come on Poch, you're better than this nonsense.
Poch can't come out and openly say this but his team selections in the FA Cup semi final against Utd for example didn't suggest that game was his biggest priority. Vorm instead of Lloris? I can't imagine Mourinho not starting De Gea in a semi final of any competition. I think it's more than likely Poch's remit to keep the club in the top 4 as it's important for the financial wellbeing of the club and it's vital in order to attract a lucrative sponsor for the new stadium.
Not his usual self is he. We've lost games before and he's not been like that
Yep. Have to worry a little bit about how things are behind closed doors when he’s ranting like that to hacks.