• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** OMT Spurs v Crystal Palace ***

Rorschach said:
It wasn't a foul though. He got the ball.
Click to expand...

On replay yes. In real time, I thought it was a foul and if you give that as a foul, you have to also give a yellow imo.

Regardless, I find this kind of thing strange. Nobody expects any player to make 100% passing accuracy, 100% shots on target, 100% tackling success etc. Yet it is expected for refs for some reason.

Jesus Kane, how on earth did he miss that?
 
Hootnow said:
On replay yes. In real time, I thought it was a foul and if you give that as a foul, you have to also give a yellow imo.

Regardless, I find this kind of thing strange. Nobody expects any player to make 400% passing accuracy, 400% shots on target, 400% tackling success etc. Yet it is expected for refs for some reason.

Jesus Kane, how on earth did he miss that?
Click to expand...
So the ref made a mistake? That is what we are debating right.
 
AdamB said:
I'm not sure why but I find Lamela an incredibly frustrating player. Maybe its because I think he should do a lot more with his ability. Just dont ever see him getting 10-15 goals a season regularly, or creating as much as he should do
Click to expand...

Agreed. Love Lamela, think he contributes so much but feel he could be doing so much more.

We really cannot afford to drop points here. A team missing 12 members of their squad, when there's a couple of top 6 match ups in the coming weeks, we need to be putting pressure on.
 
Rorschach said:
So the ref made a mistake? That is what we are debating right.
Click to expand...

No we're debating if the ref is 'against us'.

I'm saying that in real time, I would also have given that as a foul and if you give that as a foul, you should also give a yellow. On replay, it was not a foul but the ref doesn't have the benefit of a replay (or our bias) to say its not a foul.

I was then saying that these individual mistakes are used to provide evidence of ref incompetency/ corruption when, for example, Kane has just made a bigger mistake than this ref has in this match.
 
Hootnow said:
No we're debating if the ref is 'against us'.

I'm saying that in real time, I would also have given that as a foul and if you give that as a foul, you should also give a yellow. On replay, it was not a foul but the ref doesn't have the benefit of a replay (or our bias) to say its not a foul.

I was then saying that these individual mistakes are used to provide evidence of ref incompetency/ corruption when, for example, Kane has just made a bigger mistake than this ref has in this match.
Click to expand...
I'm not.
 
Hootnow said:
No we're debating if the ref is 'against us'.

I'm saying that in real time, I would also have given that as a foul and if you give that as a foul, you should also give a yellow. On replay, it was not a foul but the ref doesn't have the benefit of a replay (or our bias) to say its not a foul.

I was then saying that these individual mistakes are used to provide evidence of ref incompetency/ corruption when, for example, Kane has just made a bigger mistake than this ref has in this match.
Click to expand...

Agreed
 
I like their tactic of nothing bothering to mark Aurier - very clever. They've obviously scouted him
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back