Re: **Official Other Teams & Games Thread, Season 2012/13**
SWP? Richards? Sturridge? Barton?
Anelka? Cana? Sakho?
Sure not on the same level as the likes of Giggs, Beckham, Neville, Scholes etc. in terms of home grown talent but they have still produced some pretty decent players City.
The only youth player still in City's title winning squad that has played more than 1/3 of their league game was Richards. Anelka (PSG to Arsenal), Cana and Sakho are all bought (or poached if you prefer) from other teams.
If you count in those that left, Man Utd would have been even further ahead. Without even looking at the records, I could count Blackmore, D Ferguson, Giggs (well, this might be disputed by City fans *wink*), Hughes (returnee) etc amongst the key members of their 92/93 title winning squad. Beckham, Butt etc might have also appeared that season.
*edit* To clarify, I am not trying to belittle City's youth set-up, and they have probably produced the same level of quality/quantity youth players during the premier league era as Spurs.
But amongst the big money spending title winning teams (City, Chelsea and United, for argument sake, let's include Arsenal too), City is probably the one that relied most on $$$ to win their title (maybe you can include luck as well, they didn't even as to fight as hard as Spammers to get their freebie stadium).
In a way, Arsenal also spent on young players to win their early premier league titles, just that they spent more wisely and they also have more players graduated from their own youth team when compared to City and Chelsea.
The only factor that could mitigated City's fortune spent is that they probably faced the toughest challenge, and it's unlikely there will be another premier league winner that didn't have to spend millions to win its title.