• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Official Kabooooooom Thread

glorygloryeze said:
Question for The Moonlit Knight:

Please can you list some incidents where Kaboul's poor positional sense and lack of concentration actually cost us goals this season?

I'm sure you must be able to list some
Click to expand...

As I've already stated on this thread, I haven't made any notes about who was at fault for what goals. If I decide to stick around (and I've been back on here for a period of a few weeks after a couple of year hiatus and I can already remember why I fudged off in the first place) then next year maybe I'll keep track of it all.
 
The Moonlit Knight said:
As I've already stated on this thread, I haven't made any notes about who was at fault for what goals. If I decide to stick around (and I've been back on here for a period of a few weeks after a couple of year hiatus and I can already remember why I fudged off in the first place) then next year maybe I'll keep track of it all.
Click to expand...

Was it because you were wrong so often?
 
AberYid said:
I've already asked, twice.

Apparently, he can't remember any (shocker) but more importantly, his mistakes which didn't cost goals are as bad, if not worse. This has since gone without explanation.

Good luck getting an answer out of him.
Click to expand...

OK, I've found some match notes I made.

Everton 1-0. Everton's goal was down to Kaboul.
Utd's third goal at WHL was down to Kaboul.

I can't be arsed to go through any other match notes tonight.
 
The Moonlit Knight said:
So let me get this straight, you're allowed to tell me my opinion is absolute nonsense (not that you think it is, but that it is) and you are allowed to say that I need to accept that I AM wrong, and then you tell me that the hell I do?

Let me re-point you to my post that kicked all this off.

"I think he is vastly over rated on this board and is way too mistake prone."

Just in case you didn't get it, I highlighted the KEY word in the sentance.
Click to expand...


Ok, that's your opinion.

But you are dingdonging off other posters who are posting THEIR opinion, which happens to be the OPPOSITE of yours, and thus makes you as guilty as them, surely?

You accused Aberyid of being the forum police........jeez, he did nothing different to you, FFS!!!!

I like you, MK, you argue points well. But you have to accept that sometimes you fall into the same trap as the anti-posters on here.
 
The Moonlit Knight said:
As I've already stated on this thread, I haven't made any notes about who was at fault for what goals. If I decide to stick around (and I've been back on here for a period of a few weeks after a couple of year hiatus and I can already remember why I fudged off in the first place) then next year maybe I'll keep track of it all.
Click to expand...

Well if that's the case, is it not a bit unfair that you are tarnishing Kaboul with the 'poor positional sense' and 'lack of concentration' brush? It's like accusing somebodsy of being a criminal and then not being able to present evidence in court.

Some might actually call it libel..
 
glorygloryeze said:
Well if that's the case, is it not a bit unfair that you are tarnishing Kaboul with the 'poor positional sense' and 'lack of concentration' brush? It's like accusing somebodsy of being a criminal and then not being able to present evidence in court.

Some might actually call it libel..
Click to expand...

Read up I found two instances in a couple of match notes I made.
 
The Moonlit Knight said:
OK, I've found some match notes I made.

Everton 1-0. Everton's goal was down to Kaboul.
Utd's third goal at WHL was down to Kaboul.

I can't be arsed to go through any other match notes tonight.
Click to expand...

Ok, how about

- Balotelli penalty: down to King
- Walcott first goal: down to King

Those are just two I can remember; Does he get the same label?
 
Crawley said:
Ok, that's your opinion.

But you are dingdonging off other posters who are posting THEIR opinion, which happens to be the OPPOSITE of yours, and thus makes you as guilty as them, surely?

You accused Aberyid of being the forum police........jeez, he did nothing different to you, FFS!!!!

I like you, MK, you argue points well. But you have to accept that sometimes you fall into the same trap as the anti-posters on here.
Click to expand...

You're a mod right? fudging ban me then. Did you see what he wrote to me? HE INSULTED ME. And I am meant to just let it slide? Oh of course I am, because you also insulted me too. I just wish you'd both called me a ****, because it was less insulting that trying to demean my opinion and intelligence.

fudging unbelievable. Now I remember why I don't post on here anymore.
 
The Moonlit Knight said:
You're a mod right? fudging ban me then. Did you see what he wrote to me? HE INSULTED ME. And I am meant to just let it slide? Oh of course I am, because you also insulted me too. I just wish you'd both called me a ****, because it was less insulting that trying to demean my opinion and intelligence.

fudging unbelievable. Now I remember why I don't post on here anymore.
Click to expand...



No he didn't!!!!

He argued with you!!!!

Bloody hell mate, how many times do i need to repeat, you post some good opinions, but sometimes you let your emotions get the better of you?

I've got no problem with you arguing your point, it makes for good debate, but in this case I would argue that MOST posters disagree with you. That's all.
It's not abuse. It not persoanl attacks. it's discussion.

I'm not going to bloody ban you for that!!!!! Personally, I love your debates. Just accept that there is a counter argument sometimes.
 
The Moonlit Knight said:
I think Modric's positive contributions far outweigh those.

Kaboul was also at fault for Arsenal's fourth and fifth goals in my opinion. I am not going to go on anymore, because it's pointless.
Click to expand...

I think that's the point most on here are trying to say about Kaboul. I agree you should probably drop it as it is pointless
 
Crawley said:
No he didn't!!!!

He argued with you!!!!

Bloody hell mate, how many times do i need to repeat, you post some good opinions, but sometimes you let your emotions get the better of you?

I've got no problem with you arguing your point, it makes for good debate, but in this case I would argue that MOST posters disagree with you. That's all.
It's not abuse. It not persoanl attacks. it's discussion.

I'm not going to bloody ban you for that!!!!! Personally, I love your debates. Just accept that there is a counter argument sometimes.
Click to expand...

You don't think "For the sake of this debate, and your reputation as a contributor to this forum, could you not make such nonsensical posts again" isn't a fudging insult? And is just a debate?

Well you agree with him, so I guess my posts are nonsensical. Apologies for that, for the sake of debate (despite the fact in 5 minutes looking I've identified four goals where I THINK Kaboul was to blame) on this forum I'll fudge off.

But before I do one, I'd like to refer people to Dawson starting and then being dropped for Kaboul and then look at the record. Now I'm a Harry loyalist but it was a decision at the time I couldn't understand (I couldn't understand, just in case this escapes you that is me saying I couldn't understand rather than it being a bad decision).

Ta dah!
 
The Moonlit Knight said:
You don't think "For the sake of this debate, and your reputation as a contributor to this forum, could you not make such nonsensical posts again" isn't a fudging insult? And is just a debate?

Well you agree with him, so I guess my posts are nonsensical. Apologies for that, for the sake of debate (despite the fact in 5 minutes looking I've identified four goals where I THINK Kaboul was to blame) on this forum I'll fudge off.

But before I do one, I'd like to refer people to Dawson starting and then being dropped for Kaboul and then look at the record. Now I'm a Harry loyalist but it was a decision at the time I couldn't understand (I couldn't understand, just in case this escapes you that is me saying I couldn't understand rather than it being a bad decision).

Ta dah!
Click to expand...

Simple: Dawson lacks Kaboul's pace. They both have rushes of blood, but Kaboul has the pace to be able to have a bettter chance at rectifying the mistake
 
While on the subject about Kaboul, I have ITK information that he has a serious problem with his knee, it would be just our luck if it is degenerative, also how can I get an infraction for saying that I go to sleep reading a certain persons long drawn out and boring posts while others can have a right ding dong and not get reprimanded, is it just Milo that takes umbridge ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back