I
indianspur
Guest
You are over simplifying this here.
Take it from the point of view of the player (and more importantly his agent). Let's just say for arguments sake that the player is currently on £20k a week at Ajax and Spurs had an £8 million fee agreed for the player and then offered the player £50k a week wages. Over a 5 year contract that is a cost to Spurs of £21 million.
If the player waits for a year and goes on a Bosman then that same £21 million package equates to £80k a week all going to the player (and agent). Theoretically the player is accepting £30k a week less for one year to then earn an extra £30k a week for 5 years thereafter.
What typically happens in this scenario is that the agent starts negotiating a deal based around that £80k a week. The selling club then often have to compromise in terms of the transfer fee demanded.
The default position in this scenario is always the buying club saying: "We can sign this player on a pre-contract deal for free in 6 months time. You then have an un-interested player for a further six months that you are paying £20k a week for".
Of course in the case of Erickson it seems slightly different as he has stated that he wouldn't want Ajax not to profit from his sale. However that is very rare in this day and age of agents trying to maximise revenue for their clients (and probably, more importantly, themselves).
yes i understand what you are saying and thats why at the beginning of the post i said that each deal has to be looked at individually. i used Eriksen as an example exactly because he seems like a decent guy and he doesnt want to shaft Ajax, apparently he is not asking for mega wages from his new club, and is wanting to move to the right club where he maximises his football potential. He has even said that if he doesnt move this summer, he is willing to extend his contract with Ajax so that they will receive a good fee in the future. I hope he and his agent are being honest. it would make a refreshing change