Mate, you and I usually aren't too far off in opinions, but I disagree here
- Poch
was a great manager, and specifically he was a great manager in a club that had ambition to be top 4 and compete for titles.
- He
was a great manager in taking a very young squad, making them fit, giving them a system, improving primarily the FBs and incorporating Dele.
- Average age of that squad
was ~22 or so.
Poch has not shown himself to be a great manager when
- The requirement is to be top 4 and
win things
- The squad is established professionals at the prime of their career
- Getting truly exceptional players to push on (Dele, Eriksen, Lamela)
- Average age of the squad is ~27 or so?
I am completely, completely confused by the absolute acceptance that "the players are jaded/tired/unmotivated due to time, Poch (his job) is unable to motivate them anymore, so lets replace/rebuild"
This squad does NOT need a rebuild, and honestly if Poch believes that, he should fudging go ..
For next season as example
GK situation -> fine as long as Hugo recovers
CB's -> Jan +1 of Foyth/Sanchez/Tangaga/Dier, Toby out, potentially a new CB here (1 player)
FBs -> RB required, Davies +1 at LB, Rose out (1 player)
CM -> Sessegnon, Lamela, Winks, Lo Celso, Dele, N'dombele, Lucas, Sissoko, Eriksen out, either a DM or another creative depending on style (1 player)
Strikers -> Kane, Son, Troy, no one out, nothing needed
At most 3 players, maybe 4 if you want to add another attacking/defensive player
- Fernandes and Dybala already identified and prices apparently were agreed
- So as little as 2 players to find/buy
Poch has no rights .. I don't have a right to have a brick year because I've given my company 17 exceptional years, it just doesn't work that way.
Again, is he really an exceptional manager or was he an exceptional manager for that moment, for that squad, for this club at that particular stage of the journey?
The argument most people have re drop players, formation, whatever is "what is he doing to change the form?" (
19 losses in 41 games), seems to me to be the same, same lineups (with occasional nonsense adjustment of 1 player), same fudging diamond, same asking FBS that are not good enough to somehow be Rose/Walker of 3 seasons ago. If he is playing Eriksen because we are more worried about his sale value (with less than 12 months on contract) than results, again he should fudging go …
Levy is the success of Spurs, not Poch, Poch is just another step in a long line of progress from the early missteps -> BMJ -> Harry -> Poch and at every step I've heard when tis manager leaves it's going to be a disaster and we will lose all the progress .. really? 18+ years now of almost constant upward trajectory in results, league placement, income, player quality, almost any measure of success on or of field with exception of that very last step (trophies)
As I said mate, respect your opinion but really, the keep Poch argument seems to down to
- He will turn it around because he was good 2 years ago
- He's been a great manager for us (effectively the same point as above)
The reality
- Club is on a miserable run of form for 10 months
- We still have something to salvage this season (PL, CL and FA Cup)
- We can't refresh squad until January, at which stage the above point will no longer likely be relevant
- This should be an easy season (United, Chelsea & Scum are not at their best)
History only shows this ending one way, and the logical answer with two of the best managers in world football available is to not wait for the inevitable.
- What score do we have to lose the CL and Pool matches by to change people's mind?