• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Luka Vuskovic

If he wants to go then we will have to let him go surely? ifs its £60m we would be stupid not to right? we will 100% have a buy back clause in it and i would imagine also a sell on fee aswell.
 
Yiddo said:
Get £60m put a buy back clause in so we get first refusal for x amount everyone wins.

He is clearly not as rated with our coaching staff as he is with our fan base. If he is as good as GB and the like think, why hasn’t Bayern come in for him?
Click to expand...
The thing about a buy back clause is that a player can agree to sign for you even if the two clubs agree. At thr very least we should have a 50 percent sell on clause. Alternatively, we just say no.
 
Asked about his future, Vuskovic admitted that while his focus was on helping Croatia at the World Cup, he wanted to play for a club that wanted him.
"For now I’m focused only on the World Cup,” Vuskovic said.
“My goal next season is to play for a club that wants me and where I will play. We’ll see what happens in the coming days and weeks."
 
billyiddo said:
My guess would be that if we sell rather than loan it's because we want/need the cash to rebuild the squad now. If we didn't then I'm sure a loan would be the path we would be taking. Can't blame RDZ, he won't be around to benefit from the player if he doesn't succeed in the short term so that needs to be his focus re the transfer market.

Him becoming a generational talent won't make or break us as a team and we've seen plenty of hyped youngsters not make the grade so i can see why the manager would make the choice of selling now, if that's the case.
Click to expand...

I suppose a big enough sale could enable one more player in who can make immediate impact, if we don't believe Vuskovic can yet.
BUt a player being sold to Brighton is simply moving on in a few years for more money so we don't let him go on the cheap without a sell-on clause, especially not after the money they got out of us for Van Hecke in the last year of his contract. And considering what was paid for Leny Yoro and the French lad that Liverpool got a year ago
 
Last edited:
NaijaSpurs said:
Asked about his future, Vuskovic admitted that while his focus was on helping Croatia at the World Cup, he wanted to play for a club that wanted him.
"For now I’m focused only on the World Cup,” Vuskovic said.
“My goal next season is to play for a club that wants me and where I will play. We’ll see what happens in the coming days and weeks."
Click to expand...
It seems to me that the boy is unhappy because we have not guaranteed him a starting role next season.
 
NaijaSpurs said:
Asked about his future, Vuskovic admitted that while his focus was on helping Croatia at the World Cup, he wanted to play for a club that wanted him.
"For now I’m focused only on the World Cup,” Vuskovic said.
“My goal next season is to play for a club that wants me and where I will play. We’ll see what happens in the coming days and weeks."
Click to expand...

The only way his quotes make the remotest sense is that if we as a club have communicated that we actually don’t want him. Otherwise he is being a complete diva.

There’s a world of difference between ‘we want you to take another loan in the PL, and come back ready for us like Saliba’ and ‘we don’t want you.’

I’m still not any clearer on why a permanent move gets him any closer to Munich or Madrid than a loan and performing well for us in the subsequent years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back