alekaras
The ITK of IDK
If he turns out half a Zlatan, I'll be over the moon. He's already at 45% so not much more to go!
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Harry Kane MBE
- Thread starter thfcsteff
- Start date
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Looks a better alrounder player at the same age
glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
Question: how does Kane compare with the scum's Giroud?
Yiddo
Jack Jull
Giroud is better in the air and i think Girouds movement is better.
Kane can score from anywhere and has the ability to take on a player.
glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
Interesting; i'd agree that Giroud is better in the air....but his movement being better?? Not for me...
Agree re in the air, Kane is more clinical than Giroud, and you have to account for the fact that Giroud is 29 (a lot more experience, yet not a better player).
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Kane is more mi lie and involved. He is also more clinical in my opinion
Giroud is a good striker but only comes alive in the box. When he isn't playing well you notice it. You don't with Kane as he is constantly involved
Cochise
Steve Carr
I'd say Giroud's movement in the box is probably better than Kane's as he gets into goalscoring positions with greater frequency.
Kane does have good movement and perhaps part of the problem in comparing the two is that they are different players, playing different roles in different systems. Kane is the more reliable finisher though. Giroud isn't rated as highly because of the sheer volume of good opportunities that he fails to tuck away.
Kane does have good movement and perhaps part of the problem in comparing the two is that they are different players, playing different roles in different systems. Kane is the more reliable finisher though. Giroud isn't rated as highly because of the sheer volume of good opportunities that he fails to tuck away.
glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
Not sure about that' i suspect it's more to do with Arsenal approach play being more refined over the year's and their midfielders being able to consistently create good chances for him. Not that i think his movement is crap or anything, but in terms of movement he seems a lot more static than Kane to me...
ShelfLife
Clive Wilson
On the claminess scale? Not even on the same planet.
glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
Giroud has better hair.
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
Lukaku is the real deal, jeez his record shows no signs of slowing...
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
He certainly seems to be and one that Chelsea sold in error
Ginola99
Steven Caulker
Just out of interest how would you/anyone compare Giroud and Kane at hold up play?
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Both very good at it IMO
90291Spur
Paul Walsh
Giroud takes more pictures of himself in his under-chunders. And breathes through his nose not his mouth.
DublinSpur
Scott Parker
I do agree with that, but it's also worth pointing out just how young he still is. Decision-making is exactly the kind of thing that should improve with experience.
Right now - assuming Kane stays at Spurs for a while - if he can just maintain his current level, I believe he'll be remembered as one of our better players.
What's really exciting though, is the possibility that he'll continue to improve. He's only 22 years old! Can you imagine what sort of striker he'll be if he spends the next five years improving his game and only hits his peak at 27 like a lot of strikers. The lad has the potential to be among the very best.
Lukaku is very hot and cold .. Much more a streaky player (so far), almost ala Defoe ..