ENIC

[Lilbaz]

IIRC (if it's same interview), he said it was the duty of the board to evaluate any offers and determine if it was right/appropriate for club/shareholders.

Think people are confusing want to, plan to, or possibly. I'm not interested in selling my car/house right now, but if someone offered the right price, I would. Yes if someone offered ENIC 6B for Spurs, it's sold.

Yeah ofcourse. The clubs still growing. Next season we will earn record turnover. We're still building. For levy there is no need to sell.
Lewis trust dunno.

But the club is and has always been for sale. If the right offer comes in. The same as any player.

 

[BrainOfLevy]

They could/may sell, at some point the offer will be right, that however is different from their objective was to sell (flip, doing it on cheap narrative), what that original time horizon was and is, unknown. And to put into context, ENIC have held on to Spurs longer than any other club in the PL by a pretty big margin (next oldest owners are City, 7 years after), so it doesn't seem owner hold on to clubs for 25+ years.

You would build a stadium and a training round, you wouldn't build a billion dollar stadium with all the best functionality (decision to have no obstructed view, decision to use glass on roof, decision to pre-wire for media, biggest screens in Europe), there are literally hundreds of decisions made that would/will cut into eventual profit that just wasn't necessary. For context Chelsea sold a club that had sketchy ground rights and a brick stadium for >$4B (total), if (as the accusation always is), the only objective was to maximize profits, what Levy did, does not make sense (you are absolutely not maximizing if you overspend on improvements/upgrades)

Yeah to be clear I’ve never been one of the ‘ENIC want to flip it on the cheap’ people. But I do believe they are trying to get as much value into the club as possible.

When I think about my understanding of Levy, I can absolutely see why he would spend top of the range on the stadium, but not on players. Because one of them is sustainable, an asset that will continue to grow the value of the club, and one of them is a potentially fleeting, uncertain outcome. I’ve never bought into the idea that he is cheap, but I’ve always assumed that in order to get the maximum possible price, having everything within the club be seen as top of the range would be consistent with that.

They’re basically creating the narrative that this is the next great super club in waiting.