Kingdawson
Banned
would Mignolet, Howard, Szeczney or de Gea get in ours?
Good point.
Regarding Rose it's clear he's been v.good so far and long may it continue.
would Mignolet, Howard, Szeczney or de Gea get in ours?
I don't think that's the case. I just think a lot fans believe Rose isn't good enough. Are they harsh on him? Probably, but people call for Eriksen to be benched after 1 bad game. The difference is, I'm not entirely sure we sign better players realistically in Lamela's or Eriksen's position given their age and ability and where we are in the food chain, I don't think the same could be said for Rose.
I don't think a lack of effort applies to either Rose or Adebayor, they both put a shift in.
To go back to Rose, imo he's good enough for us. He wouldn't get into Arsenal/City/Chelsea/Utd sides, but neither would Eriksen, Lamela or Chadli.
Again, Rose is one of those players who some of our fans are going to hold to a different standard, coz plenty of people have already made their minds up on him and unless he plays perfectly in every game, those people will slaughter him.
Would Rose get into United's, Arsenal's, Liverpool's or Everton's team?
Seriously sc25?
You're going to have a right go at others for being too harsh on Rose to the point of accusing others of disliking him for playing well for Spurs (pretty strong words). At the same time you're questioning why people aren't having more of a go at our 21 year old newly signed left back after one EL start and one PL sub appearance...
Danny Rose got a massive start to his Spurs career thanks to THAT goal. Like most he was given a lot of slack and time when he first broke through as a younger player too. He's 24 now, has over 30 starts for Spurs and around 60 PL starts for us and Sunderland combined, he's being scrutinized a bit more than Ben Davies who is still to make his full league debut for us at 21. No ****.
I don't think Rose has been given any more flak than Naughton, Paulinho, Vertonghen, Townsend or Lennon just to list a few.
Do you think we could finish in the top 5 with Danny Rose as left back? (We finished top 6 with him there last season, so I thought I'd raise it a notch).
Good point.
Regarding Rose it's clear he's been v.good so far and long may it continue.
Its worse than that. Even if he plays perfectly some will dislike him even more for having proven them wrong. As such, Rose is in a no-win situation.
Would Ben Davies? How come his thread doesn't get bumped? He cost 10 or 11 mil (so only about 5mil more than Paulinho who's price tag is often cited in here). Yes, we needed LB cover. (and we needed a striker too). Davies arrived amid fanfare, but hasn't beat out Rose, yet is being given a free pass. Since Davies cost us about 10 times what Rose did, shouldn't the scrutiny and expectations and criticism of Davies be more than it is for Rose?
would Mignolet, Howard, Szeczney or de Gea get in ours?
Sorry mate, but how is it clear? It's just one person's opinion against another's.
Plenty who have previously criticised have acknowledged he's been doing well under Poch. Poch clearly thinks so too...
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
Doesn't bother me when fans defend their own for diving. I just find it hypocritical when they their toys out the pram when teams do the same against us. And no I'm not going to name names.
He was very good against QPR. As for the other games, I don't see much improvement.
I understand fans being defensive over our players from what they see as harsh criticism, but not all fans who don't necessarily rate a player that highly are spacegoating him as it appears some sadly are claiming.