-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Daniel Levy - Chairman
- Thread starter Howard Webb
- Start date
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
FA approved deal, highly unlikely they are going to take retrospective action on themselves
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
We will be relegated whilst Chelsea/City get away with everything
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
parklane1
Tony Galvin
I have met him on several occasions and he reminded me of that old saying " Bent as a nine bob note"
Chrissivad
Dean Austin
Anyone who had big Sam as manager must be bricking themselves...
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
Journo hatchet job isn't it? The bloke was just on talksport saying the FA SHOULD investigate so its not even clear they are.
I am sure it was him saying they paid off 6 agents for one deal to happen on a podcast.
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
superspurs
Justin Edinburgh
Rosie47 strikes again!
Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
Probably drag up the venables thing again.
El Guepardo
Rafael Van Der Vaart
Surely this would be time barred given that City’s charges were?
parklane1
Tony Galvin
Indeed.
No. Just Matt Lawton had a dead story. But due to other events will pump it out.
It has already gone through the fa.
No time bar for the prem. although this is the fa.
It’s already been investigated and dealt with.
Just been brought up due to recent attention on city, Chelsea etc...
Obfuscation and trying to deflect attention i’m guessing.
Can anyone tell me why Skye Andrews was sitting in the studio saying he couldn’t talk about the situation because it was ongoing?
His case had been resolved 15 years ago. He can talk about it as much as he wants if i’m not mistaken?
He nor Matt lawton can decide if there is another case.
His case had been resolved 15 years ago. He can talk about it as much as he wants if i’m not mistaken?
He nor Matt lawton can decide if there is another case.
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
Mate I found that so strange. On their complaining about a case resolved 15 years ago, went through arbitration and the FA and was resolved. Just smelt like a hatchet job for sake of it
Attention is on city. Why hasn't their case been heard yet? It's been over 4 and a half years now.
I would love to see when lawton asked the fa about this. I have a sneaking suspicion it was yesterday.
Deflection. Obfuscation.
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
Does Andrews even rep anyone anymore? Never hear his name anymore, maybe he needs to figure out why that might be