Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Both were £30m form what I read just now googling the wagesNot true.... Wjinaldum cost less than Sissoko.
And wilnaldum did confirm he turned us down
Both were £30m form what I read just now googling the wagesNot true.... Wjinaldum cost less than Sissoko.
Mourinho? Not sure how much the sacking cost, but yes it turned out to be a waste, but as I said I could understand the gamble.Massive waste of £30 odd million of the clubs money though right?
Or were players we could afford at the time and the manager thought were what he neededSchneiderlin went the following season. He was ready to come to Spurs for the wages we were offering at the time. I don’t know what went on between levy and the Southampton board but Southampton blocked it much to Schneiderlin’s disappointment I believe. I don’t know what the issue was with Winjnaldum but we were linked for a while before Liverpool met the asking price then blew us out of the water with their wage offer. Martial was the same but with Utd. So instead we wasted millions on players who were not up to scratch.
Wjinaldum was £26m. Sissoko £31m (according to Transfermrkt who are usually pretty good).Both were £30m form what I read just now googling the wages
And wilnaldum did confirm he turned us down
Schneiderlin went the following season. He was ready to come to Spurs for the wages we were offering at the time. I don’t know what went on between levy and the Southampton board but Southampton blocked it much to Schneiderlin’s disappointment I believe. I don’t know what the issue was with Winjnaldum but we were linked for a while before Liverpool met the asking price then blew us out of the water with their wage offer. Martial was the same but with Utd. So instead we wasted millions on players who were not up to scratch.
Poch then Mourinho.Mourinho? Not sure how much the sacking cost, but yes it turned out to be a waste, but as I said I could understand the gamble.
In Wijnaldum's case pay the transfer fee (and then agree his wage)What could we have done differently to get them? Southampton wouldn't sell to us and we couldn't afford to pay more in wages than Liverpool or United?
And said he met Poch but Klopp made him feel good. So he signed for themWjinaldum was £26m. Sissoko £31m (according to Transfermrkt who are usually pretty good).
Wjinaldum didn't turn us down at all. He said that once he spoke to Liverpool he wanted to go there but also said that Liverpool agreed a fee with his club and Spurs didn't.
Didn’t we beat City at home then score 3 times at their place despite losing Kane? As for Ajax who cares who was the better side? Were we not missing Kane and Son in the first leg and playing a crocked Wanyama as Sissoko was also injured? I think the Anti Poch narrative has probably clouded what actually happened during that run.It was huge amounts of luck, City absolutely battered us and should've won comfortably, Ajax were comfortably the better side over the two legs and we were even lucky to get out of the group
But the knock on of paying higher wages has an impact on the existing contracts tooIn Wijnaldum's case pay the transfer fee (and then agree his wage)
In Mane's case pay the transfer fee and match the wages.
Basically just how transfers are done.
This is what i mean wrt people saying just a little more - we've spent well(lots) over the last couple of years yet still it isn't seen as enough as there's always a little bit more that could have been spent/done. We just needed that extra back up CF or 40m CB on top of the 3rd/4th highest spend in the league to really push on...
Very easy to say that when only one club agrees a transfer fee and you've ended up signing for them.And said he met Poch but Klopp made him feel good. So he signed for them
It happens
We deservedly beat them at homeDidn’t we beat City at home then score 3 times at their place despite losing Kane? As for Ajax who cares who is the better side? Were we not missing Kane and Son in the first leg and playing a crocked Wanyama as Sissoko was also injured? I think the Anti Poch narrative has probably clouded I think that I am a better football fan than the rest of you to the reality of what took place during that run.
In Wijnaldum's case pay the transfer fee (and then agree his wage)
In Mane's case pay the transfer fee and match the wages.
Basically just how transfers are done.
The other side of that is the rose tinted glasses, when it comes to Poch, have clouded the view of others when it comes to that run...Didn’t we beat City at home then score 3 times at their place despite losing Kane? As for Ajax who cares who is the better side? Were we not missing Kane and Son in the first leg and playing a crocked Wanyama as Sissoko was also injured? I think the Anti Poch narrative has probably clouded I think that I am a better football fan than the rest of you to the reality of what took place during that run.
That does suit your argument I agreeVery easy to say that when only one club agrees a transfer fee and you've ended up signing for them.
I mean he was hardly going to say: "Actually I really wanted to sign for Spurs but Levy was offering some second hand training kit and £20 a week for 12 years, whereas Liverpool agreed a transfer fee with Saudi Sportswashing Machine so I had to settle for them" was he?
Chelsea in 2012 say ‘hello’No one lucks their way to the final of the biggest tournament in club football. We had some luck yes. But you also make your luck through a good system, good management and determination. I seem to remember us at different times being without Kane, Son and Dele. Even without, at that time a relatively in form Sissoko. How long do you think it will be before we luck our way to another Champions League final? Bloody hell it is a ridiculous narrative.
But the knock on of paying higher wages has an impact on the existing contracts too
Paying a new signing more than your better proven players can lead to them being unhappy