jts1882
Dean Richards
Ouch.
Louis van Gaal rewriting his Manchester United story fools nobody - and certainly not Spurs
Louis van Gaal rewriting his Manchester United story fools nobody - and certainly not Spurs
Depending on who you listen to, the late Bobby Robson was either treated very badly by Barcelona or even worse than that, when the old boy was shown the door in the summer of 1997 after winning a Copa del Rey and the old European Cup-winners’ Cup.
It was so bad that Jose Mourinho, then a 34-year-old translator with additional cone-laying and chauffeuring responsibilities threatened to quit over his famous mentor’s treatment and had to be talked out of it. “I honestly did not like it. They just moved Robson upstairs. I thought it was awful towards him.” That was not Mourinho, rather it was Robson’s successor Louis Van Gaal who gave an insight into his feelings on the matter years later. He clearly felt strongly about it, albeit not quite strongly enough to prevent him from taking the job.
You might have noticed that Van Gaal is back again, still very much addressing the issues of his two seasons at Old Trafford in the manner of a shouty farmer explaining his views on the right to roam. His recent BBC interview concluded that for his last six months at Manchester United, “the media has a noose around my neck” with the stories about Mourinho’s summer arrival enduring through the season. He said he found it hard to take that Ed Woodward, United’s executive vice-chairman, was in contact with his successor for six months “and he [Woodward] keeps his mouth shut”.
Indeed, managerial transitions of this kind are rarely ideal although on reflection that does sound a lot like what happened to Robson at Barcelona 19 years earlier.
They do like to rewrite history, these managers of a certain vintage who are only one bad result away from reminding you how many European Cups they have won. The facts of the matter have not changed since Van Gaal’s departure getting on for three years ago, the key one being that United were unquestionably dying of boredom under his reign. They averaged fewer goals in that 2015-2016 season than any United team in the Premier League years, and a total of 49 was only one more than the abject Sunderland team that just avoided relegation.
...
The football was lamentable at United under Van Gaal, FA Cup winner or not. The club was stalled again three years on from Sir Alex Ferguson’s departure and everyone knew it. The Telegraph broke the story that Cup final day that Van Gaal was finally out and Mourinho was on his way but there was no conspiracy to undermine the Dutch incumbent. It is just the unfortunate, messy timing that often occurs when clubs are scrambling around for a solution to unexpected problems.
It allowed Van Gaal to leave as the wronged man although in the weeks leading up to that final, as his team stuttered in the league, it was obvious that he had to go. As for his bold assertion that he should have chosen Tottenham Hotspur in 2014 on account of the aging profile of United’s squad, that rather ignores the problems Spurs had at the time. Mauricio Pochettino inherited a few awkward types of his own that required clearing out, including whichever unidentified player it was he would later say shouted a Mourinho song in the face of his assistant Jesus Perez during their first season.
Spurs finished five points and one place better off than United the season before Van Gaal took over, and although Van Gaal overhauled them in his first season, by the time he left Spurs were two places and four points better off than United. One thing is sure: while Van Gaal may believe he made the wrong choice, Spurs certainly know they did not.