Could he do what Sandro does for us? No. Not even close.
We seem to thrive with a Destroyer in the middle, looking back to last year when we came fourth, and this year when we are currently on track to come fourth (sort of).
Which footballer would i rather have in our side? Sandro.
But Carrick doesn't need to destroy - he's much cleaverer than that. He's an intercepting DM in the mould of Guardiola, Redondo, Pirlo and Senna.
But Carrick doesn't need to destroy - he's much cleaverer than that. He's an intercepting DM in the mould of Guardiola, Redondo, Pirlo and Senna.
Honestly can't see what Carrick does better defensively than Sandro. Sandro tackles and intercepts more.
Here are some stats.
Sandro averaged 3.6 intercepts per game this season and Carrick averages 2.4 intercepts per game this season in the PL.
Sandro averaged 3.3 tackles per game this season and Carrick averages 2.3 tackles per game this season in the PL.
So what does Carrick do as this 'intercepting DM' that makes him superior?
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/2115
http://www.whoscored.com/Players/68890
Players might not attempt a pass if there's an opposition player positioned in the right place.
This. I'd swap anyone currently at Spurs (except Bale) for Carrick.
Had we kept him, I believe this would be at least our 3rd season in a row in the CL, if not more.
Based on current form I'd put Carrick ahead of Dembele. I wouldn't compare him to Sandro.
Could he do what Sandro does for us? No. Not even close.
That's because they play in completely different positions in midfield
how on earth do you come to that conclusion? we had modric previous seasons and he's superior to carrick, so im not sure what you're basing your comments on.. i think we got rid of him at the right time and for the right price.
Based on current form I'd put Carrick ahead of Dembele. I wouldn't compare him to Sandro.
That's because they play in completely different positions in midfield