• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Biased BBC

More classic BBC:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18135042

The BBC's Paul Adams at Camp David says both that communique and Mr Obama's speech showed the US and French position had won out over Germany and Britain's pro-austerity stance.

They decided not to report the facts:

US National Debt 2008 $10,699,804,612,604
US National Debt 2012 $15,125,898,976,397

”We will cut the debt in half by the end of my first term.”, Obama (2008.) :ross:

The BBC are sticking with Hollande's genius public sector spending "growth" (more fudging debt/public sector spending) plans instead
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Todays example.......Cameron is the British Prime Minister FFS!! Now they're caning him for giving the kraut some stick?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Quite sad.

Taking off my Spurs glasses I can see how neurtrals were enthralled and wanted the Chelsea scum to win.

I would never had wanted chelsea to win them or Emirates Marketing Project do not deserve anything. When arsenal got to their final against barcelona they deserved it more then the two oil clubs.

As for the BBC im not even sure how much the fee is a year it just comes straight out in a direct debit in january, but with money being tight i imagine the are a lot of people who would rather keep 150 quid then watch bbc, it is unfair to make someone pay for something they do not want to watch.

If as a football fan tottenham suddenly started charging me money for the local cricket club i would be fudging furious.
 
Some excellent evidence provided by those on the right.

I've yet to see any "right wing" articles posted by those on the left.

Have we won the debate?
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Todays example.......Cameron is the British Prime Minister FFS!! Now they're caning him for giving the kraut some stick?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Quite sad.

Taking off my Spurs glasses I can see how neurtrals were enthralled and wanted the Chelsea scum to win.

tumblr_m3wxde9In81qzsq2i.jpg
 
Biased BBC ... i think the problem most people have in this thread is the fact it is not biased towards their party.

Gotta be honest, I disagree with this. I have no problem with a news medium being biased, as long as they don't claim to be unbiased at the same time. For example I have no problem with the Guardian being left wing, because it is openly so. The same for the Telegraph and being right wing.

Personally I'm not sure if the BBC is as biased as some of the posters in here think but I really only read the sports pages anyway
 
Gotta be honest, I disagree with this. I have no problem with a news medium being biased, as long as they don't claim to be unbiased at the same time. For example I have no problem with the Guardian being left wing, because it is openly so. The same for the Telegraph and being right wing.

Personally I'm not sure if the BBC is as biased as some of the posters in here think but I really only read the sports pages anyway

As i have said earlier all news agency have a bias and agenda, it depends on what the individuals own agenda and bias is which pushes for one and against the other
 
Am I reading that wrong. It reads like Nick Robinson is desperately looking for the negatives on Labours behalf?!
 
As i have said earlier all news agency have a bias and agenda, it depends on what the individuals own agenda and bias is which pushes for one and against the other

Wilfully missing the point again. No other organisation forces you to fund them, under pain of imprisonment, whether you watch/read their output or not.
 
Back