• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

American politics

Oh, I know, I went back and eddited my post, that is more to do with CRT.

Anyway... CRT in America schools (better video)

It’s a tad more than an ‘edit’ to the original.
We all edit posts from time to time but it’s good practice to mention ‘edit’ and show what you have edited.

I think for all your angry, ranty posts a lot of what you say about government choices is on the mark but I disagree with your focus on immigration as the be all and end all of evil.

Note : only just realised this is the American politics thread rather than the general Politics thread. Apologies for derailing.
 
It’s a tad more than an ‘edit’ to the original.
We all edit posts from time to time but it’s good practice to mention ‘edit’ and show what you have edited.

I think for all your angry, ranty posts a lot of what you say about government choices is on the mark but I disagree with your focus on immigration as the be all and end all of evil.
My appologies for not putting in edit, just forget :)

Never siad it was the be all and end all.

But it is the issue that if goverments continue to ignore, play games with and never address then they will be torn apart at the election by the electorate. Just as the tories were. Labout never won the election, the Tories were just ruthglessly punished.

And I'll say it again, nothing wrong a with well managed and sustainable level of immigration. Too much and it is bad and too little it is bad.
 
My appologies for not putting in edit, just forget :)

Never siad it was the be all and end all.

But it is the issue that if goverments continue to ignore, play games with and never address then they will be torn apart at the election by the electorate. Just as the tories were. Labout never won the election, the Tories just ruthglessly punished.

And I'll say it again, nothing wrong a with well managed and sustainable level of immigration. Too much and it is bad and too little it is bad.
And nothing wrong with what you have said there - or rather how you have said it, which (at the risk of sounding incredibly patronising) seems to be more reasoned than your usual posts.
The trouble is it is whilst governments might ignore the electorate, the opposition will whip up discontent then sit back and watch things burn. Both sides are playing a game.
 
And nothing wrong with what you have said there - or rather how you have said it, which (at the risk of sounding incredibly patronising) seems to be more reasoned than your usual posts.
The trouble is it is whilst governments might ignore the electorate, the opposition will whip up discontent then sit back and watch things burn. Both sides are playing a game.
That is because you haven't insinuated that I am a racist c*nt, thick, talking shyte, taking the p*ss out of me in your post.

You posted to me like a person.

I think the problem is more to do with left calling everyone far right, every time some one brings up the issue of the likes of immigration.

Just as Starmer did regarding the protests. Yes, of course there were people that far right thugs that were rioting, but the majority of protesters were peaceful and concerned about knife crime and genuine concerns regarding mass immigration. Yes, the far thugs tried to highjack it all, but Starmer got the go old labelling brush and royally screwed up. Labelling ordinary people who have concerns as those.

What was more evident, was the complete lack of public calling out of the Muslim rioters, carrying machetes and knives, where was the comdemnationation of these acts? And it all plays into the persona that public have built up... Why only call out white people, but not muslim for doing the same bad thing?

Not so much the opposition as whole, but certainly elements (minority/majority don't know) are able to whip it up, is because the left are usually the one's loading the gun with the ammunition the right wing feed off.

As was said earlier by Glasgow I think, Trump didn;t judge people or something akin to that, he let people be themselves... Where as the left, as shown in both political threads on this forum, the left do that. They just insult, ism, phobe, and refuse to see problems (not all left, but an awful lot)

And it is easier to get your message across, when people don't think your side are a bunch of....

Bothside are playing a game, but left are the ones who constantly shooting themselves in the foot.

Edited my post, better English and more clarification etc etc.
 
You call it ancedotal, but it is not...

You are just ignoring it, becaue you don't like it and that possibly can't be the problem... So you brush it off BS.

But it not, you had one of the writers from the Witcher TV series, spilling the beans that the producer (female activists) hated the original story and litrature becase it was to male centric, and she decided that the show should be more about the female characters, and resulting in the Witcher playing 2nd fiddle in his own show.

The literal definition of an anecdote.
 
The literal definition of an anecdote.
I can't help it if that happened.

This is the problem. You just refuse to see it becaue you don't like it.

Then when Trump gets into power, you all wonder why, missing the point entirely.

Your just sticking your fingers in your ears singing la la la la telling me you are making stuff up.
 
You were right. I couldn't be bothered to watch the full 9 minutes of his anecdotal BS waffling. Thought i did well to get to about the 6 minute mark.

He connects dots with no evidence on whether those dots should be joined, beyond him seeing patterns he wants to see. Did Dr Who ratings go down because the writing crew were DEI hires or because they just wrote poor scripts (including the various cis-, hetero-normal, white males in the writing team)? Dr Who crashed in the 90s because??? It wasn't because of progressive policies then. He does also wedge in his belief that Dr Who should be male without explicitly saying that that is part of the problem. The top video is just an opinionated bloke ranting dressing it all up as 'critical thinking' (sounds familiar).

Also spent a short time trawling the various forums that come up when you search woke and the decline of gaming and it seems lots are tinkled off because other people can choose the gender of their character ("woke!!!!") but then the telling line is 'they should concentrate on the narrative and not on these issues' which tends to suggest the game's unpopularity is actually down to it just being a little shyte whether you choose to have a character that identifies as male, female, centaur, chimera or whatever.
Dr who is tanking because the effects are crap and blue peter could do them better. That was fine when we were kids and everyone had crap effects, now there is no excuse for it.

Non solid gamers are turning off because of the cost of the game and the "Micro purchase" culture the developers are pushing.
 
And nothing wrong with what you have said there - or rather how you have said it, which (at the risk of sounding incredibly patronising) seems to be more reasoned than your usual posts.
The trouble is it is whilst governments might ignore the electorate, the opposition will whip up discontent then sit back and watch things burn. Both sides are playing a game.
A small amount of his message is fine, he totally ruins it with his delivery.
 
Dr who is tanking because the effects are crap and blue peter could do them better. That was fine when we were kids and everyone had crap effects, now there is no excuse for it.

Non solid gamers are turning off because of the cost of the game and the "Micro purchase" culture the developers are pushing.
Whilst that is part of the problem, DEI and woke ideology are playing a massive part.

But then you don't go on twitter or what youtube videos that actually point this out.

People hate woke, you need to deal with it and accept it.

It is up to you to wake up to what is happening.
 
Whilst that is part of the problem, DEI and woke ideology are playing a massive part.

But then you don't go on twitter or what youtube videos that actually point this out.

People hate woke, you need to deal with it and accept it.

It is up to you to wake up to what is happening.
They are playing a very small part.
Most gamers consider themselves to be a little bit on the outside so are generally quite welcoming to others.
 
My argument has been that wokeness is one, if not the biggest factors of why Trump won the election?

What part of this is, isn't an argument?
As Kandi pointed out it's more of an opinion than an argument.

If I was to use your style of making arguments I could just say that the anti wokeness is a factor of why Trump won the election. Where does that get us?

Use some reasoning to explain why X caused Y, define your terms, give
an example. Provide any kind of rationale or example of what you mean actually happening. Seriously, just google how to structure an argument. It's really not that difficult.
 
Dr who is tanking because the effects are crap and blue peter could do them better. That was fine when we were kids and everyone had crap effects, now there is no excuse for it.

Non solid gamers are turning off because of the cost of the game and the "Micro purchase" culture the developers are pushing.
Whilst that is part of the problem, DEI and woke ideology are playing a massive part.

But then you don't go on twitter or what youtube videos that actually point this out.

People hate woke, you need to deal with it and accept it.

It is up to you to wake up to what is happening.
They are playing a very small part.
Most gamers consider themselves to be a little bit on the outside so are generally quite welcoming to others.
Not according to the likes of Kataku.

Gamers are the problem.
 
As Kandi pointed out it's more of an opinion than an argument.

If I was to use your style of making arguments I could just say that the anti wokeness is a factor of why Trump won the election. Where does that get us?

Use some reasoning to explain why X caused Y, define your terms, give
an example. Provide any kind of rationale or example of what you mean actually happening. Seriously, just google how to structure an argument. It's really not that difficult.
And we would be closer to the answer, as the issues arises from the not only these insane ideologies that people are rejecting, but the fact that people will shift towards those who have an anti-woke agenda, because they are not calling them rascits, bigots, mysogynists, nazis, fascistists...
 
Back