I would like to see us play Livermore in place of Lennon. He isn't as good going forward as Krancjar, but he is decent passer, would offer cover for Walker so he could get forward and would likely be more up to the physical challenge that Bolton are likely to provide. I like Niko and think he is great attacking player when we have the beating of a team, but what distressed me in his recent performances has been his bottling ever 50-50 challenge. I think Bolton are likely to come here with orders to get stuck in and I'd rather have Livermore out there trying to win/keep possession from defensive clearances.
I'm not saying it is ideal or that Livermore based, on few good performances is a savior, but I think he do better for us than Krancjar.
with livermore in, the formation changes. even if the purpose is to play him right side midfield, he'd start to wander back more centrally. just comes down to the fact that he's not used to providing width or hugging the line.
would look more like this...
..................... Ade ...................
............. Bale ....... VdV ............
.... Modric .. Parker .. Livermore ..
BAE ...... Kaboul .. King .... Walker
.................. Friedel ..................
dont get me wrong, imo Livermore is a fantastic asset to have, but it would ask an awful lot of BAE and Walker to get forward.
and there in lies the rub. For me, if we hypothetically replaced BAE and Walker with Evra and Alves, the issue of width wouldn't be a problem. Evra and Alves bomb forward at every chance. Not trying to hold walker and Bae to that standard, but if they increased they're production, it would definitely solve that width problem. When things were going well a few months ago, Benny was almost playing as a second LW and Kyle was getting forward much more often than at present.
with Bale moving about wherever he wants, its imperative for Benny to keep pressing forward down the line keeping opposing fullbacks honest, same goes for Walker.