The fact you think a starts/goals table shows who the better player is says it all
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Xherdan Shaqiri
- Thread starter PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
- Start date
The fact you think a starts/goals table shows who the better player is says it all
PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
Serge Aurier
For an attacking midfielder yes mate.
PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
Serge Aurier
I’m bored of this. I want Shakiri. He’s a FAR better player than Lamela.
Night x
Night x
Not really. Each of our AMs have different skill sets which gives us good versatility. An AMs job in our team isn’t just about scoring goals otherwise Lamela wouldnt get anywhere near the team. Yes he can up his game in the goalscoring stakes, especially as he has good technique on the ball but it doesn’t make sense to replace him with....
That’s nonsense like all the people saying Dele was having a poor season purely because he wasn’t scoring as many when in fact he was providing more assists and role in the team had changed somewhat from previous season....For an attacking midfielder yes mate.
parklane1
Tony Galvin
Shakiri may score more goals then Lamela but that is not everything, we have others who can score but Lamela probably works harder ( for the team) in one game then Shakiri does all season. He is a lazy sod with a " i am the best player around" attitude which is the last thing we/Poch needs in our side.
awesome dawson
Mitchell Thomas
I don't want him because he looks like a Jack Wheelchair/Dwarf.
thfcsteff
George Hunt
I love Lamela, I don't think this signing would be anything to do with him if it were even remotely possible. I think it really is a case of "weird if it happened" as he simply would not last more than 20 mins in a Poch side, thus maybe a bench option to conjure something from nothing when we are getting stonewalled by 10 behind the ball. That is the only semi-logical reason I can find...
The_Midlands_Yid
Andy Gray
Not for me. £12 mil is cheap in this market but realistically what do we need him for? Use that 12 towards a more important deal
PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
Serge Aurier
Don’t get the Lamela love. Yes he defends (well done there!) but he gives away far too many fouls, hardly scores and does too many tricks. 5 years and I’m still trying to see a player there.
Come on Levy get shakiri in and replace lamela.
Come on Levy get shakiri in and replace lamela.
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Ian Walker
If someone wants to sell you a Porsche for £250 there's a reason.
PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
Serge Aurier
But Dele is actually a very good player. there’s a difference there.
The logic I think would be that he'd far more like-for-like cover for Eriksen than anyone we have. I think most of us doubt his work-rate/fitness, so his success would be predicated on Poch and team resolving that.
If they did solve that though, signing Shaqiri would mean that
(i) Eriksen could sit out domestic cup games (and stay at home rather than be on the bench as emergency cover),
(ii) we wouldnt be devoid of any creativity if Eriksen was out, whether rested or injured, and
(iii) in games where we decided to drop Eriksen deeper when we're chasing the game, we would have an option to not lose creativity in the no 10 type role
I'm not saying that he'd be top of my list of signings, but if we can't find anyone else in a similar mould then at £12m I think its a reasonable punt (look at it this way, if this work-rate is solved then he's a £30m-£40m player at least, if not he's a Stoke/West Ham £10m player...so at £12m is a de-risked price)
PochettinoPochettinoPochettino
Serge Aurier
I’d bloody love it will if we signed him just to wind you lot up. Obviously would never want the saviour that is Lamela to be sold though, as there would be riots on here!
Gazza
Frederic Kanoute
Could have read that from a gooners perspective
StephenH
David Ginola
I would agree with you about Lamela in the past. This last seasons version is far fitter and I’m less critical.
Lamela should stay and I’d take punt on Shaqiri IF he fits into the overal plan for next season
Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
I'd have no problem with Spurs replacing Lamela this summer, but I would hope we could replace him with a better player than Shakiri.