Roland Beurre
Tony Parks
Wwwwdwdlwww
Worst URL ever.
Worst URL ever.
The UEFA cup as it was then was still a very decent competition when we qualified that first year.
Group stage - Bruges, Levekusen, Besiktas. Latter stages - Feyernoord (if they weren't kicked out), Braga & Sevilla. Some of those were very very good teams and it was a difficult route to navigate.
The group stages now don't compare - its like sleep walking until the knock out phase. Some of the teams now, with all due respect to them, shouldn't be on the same pitch as a team of Tottenham Hotspur's standing.
To be fair the Champions League is going that way
Group Stages - Pap
Early Knock Outs - Watchable
Final 8 - Very decent
If I had it my way, you'd go back to the CL being just champions and a straight knock-out competition, the EL being 2nd - 4th for big leagues and various reductions downwards and cup-winners cup for domestic cup winners again.
Amen on that one, and they you end up with real power houses of places in far flung Hungary who get to the Semi Final or Belgrade. I loved them days.
I found my 91/92 football Italia annual the other day and it showed the European Cup ties for the season, some of the names in that cup, never again will you see them in the same level.
Red Star, Sparta in the last stages, Malmo, Steaua Bucuresti
Great days there were
I think it was brilliant. Football was a lot more interesting back then. You had star players bourne out of nowhere in these cup runs, who would then sign for a big italian team or Barca & Real Madrid. Now these clubs poach all these players as kids before they've even had a run with their teams and massive local clubs are barely noticed.
The Champions League is boring now for me. Oh wow, another Real Madrid v Bayern Munich final, how utterly tedious.
Agree to a point BUT all teams deserve to start or compete somewhere., and from our point of view (and other big clubs) that group phase can be an oppurtunity to get squad players game time and maybe the odd one playing themselves into the prem team. it could literally be a B team.
And from the knock-outs it can be more competitive than the CL. I mean Fiorentina as a last 32 opponent, then another 3 match-ups just to make the final, thats tough. All it lacks is those giant 4/5 teams and a whole load of marketing b*llocks behind it.
All of the Estonian pub teams deserve a chance, there just needs to be a load more preliminary rounds before PL teams are introduced.
We should really be coming in at the last 32 stage.
100% agree with this.
There's even an argument that we should be in some sort of preliminary for the CL - say top 3 qualify, next 3 in PL go into a premilinary round for CL. How teams like NK Maribor are playing in the CL when we've played them the year before in the Europa league and frankly, we're on a different planet ability-wise. There's no way we should be damned to the lower competition while Maribor make up the numbers in the CL.
If I had it my way, you'd go back to the CL being just champions and a straight knock-out competition, the EL being 2nd - 4th for big leagues and various reductions downwards and cup-winners cup for domestic cup winners again.
I remember how happy we were when we first believed we were going to qualify for Europe for the first time under Jol (after a decade+ without)
Then = We are going European tour
Now = put out the kids, ****pot cup, etc.
The UEFA cup as it was then was still a very decent competition when we qualified that first year.
Group stage - Bruges, Levekusen, Besiktas. Latter stages - Feyernoord (if they weren't kicked out), Braga & Sevilla. Some of those were very very good teams and it was a difficult route to navigate.
The group stages now don't compare - its like sleep walking until the knock out phase. Some of the teams now, with all due respect to them, shouldn't be on the same pitch as a team of Tottenham Hotspur's standing.
Does seem daft that champions from countries like Estonia (average league attendance 255), Gibraltar (total population 29k), San Marino (ground capacity of champions, 500) get to quality for the preliminary rounds every year regardless whilst the 13th richest club on the planet rarely gets the chance through a mere accident of geography.
But if you turn that round, the only reason that we are the 13th richest club is also through a mere accident of geography. If we happened to instead be the 5th or 6th biggest club in Estonia or Lithuania or Finland, Scotland or Ireland, etc then we wouldn't get anywhere near playing even Europa League football. You can therefore argue that we already benefit hugely from our accident of geography.
The problem with excluding the clubs from the smaller nations at the expense of those from the larger nations is that you would end up having a competition that was made up of 10 clubs from England, 8 from Germany, 6 from Italy and Spain, 4 from France and 3 each from Portugal, Turkey, Greece and The Netherlands.
Does seem daft that champions from countries like Estonia (average league attendance 255), Gibraltar (total population 29k), San Marino (ground capacity of champions, 500) get to quality for the preliminary rounds every year regardless whilst the 13th richest club on the planet rarely gets the chance through a mere accident of geography.
As has been said it might be better to have preliminary play-offs to decide who gets a crack at the big guns. The top European competitions should be played out by the best teams. If that means a seeding system and qualifiers for that then I'm all for it. If the best teams are from the countries you have suggested then its up to the minnows to knock them out, otherwise I think it should be widened to allow us and others in England and other Euro countries a crack.
The problem with excluding the clubs from the smaller nations at the expense of those from the larger nations is that you would end up having a competition that was made up of 10 clubs from England, 8 from Germany, 6 from Italy and Spain, 4 from France and 3 each from Portugal, Turkey, Greece and The Netherlands.