• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Worst pundit or commentator

I don’t mean to be all politically correct but why?

And I’m not having a pop but I hear this a lot with very little about what they actually say being used as the reason they shouldn’t be commenting on the men’s game.

I honestly find the female pundits no worse than the men. I know Eni Aluko gets an awful lot of stick and she’s had a few brainfarts (like Kevin Keegan and Bobby Robson before her to name but two) but I have found her quite insightful at times.

Why would calling out a misogynist be “politically correct”?
 
Last edited:
Christ, that woman’s voice.
Nails on a blackboard.
Ha ha that's it for me, just do not like women commentators. Have listened to male commentators for over 50 years and it's just what I like/am used to. Sorry if that offends certain people on here who think we should all like everything and everyone.
Pundit wise I think Emma Hayes, Karen Carney and Sue with the 'Sybil Fawlty hair' are very good.
 
Ha ha that's it for me, just do not like women commentators. Have listened to male commentators for over 50 years and it's just what I like/am used to. Sorry if that offends certain people on here who think we should all like everything and everyone.
Pundit wise I think Emma Hayes, Karen Carney and Sue with the 'Sybil Fawlty hair' are very good.

No one thinks it offensive, strange maybe, but not offensive

Its offensive when people make it offensive, which is what people take issue with
 
Ok fair point.
But why is it strange? If you like something you like something, if you don't you don't no?

Strange maybe the wrong word, but I don't get how people get so down on commentary just on the sex of who is speaking, surely it's what they say than who they are?
 
Strange maybe the wrong word, but I don't get how people get so down on commentary just on the sex of who is speaking, surely it's what they say than who they are?
Most commentators churn out the same comments during a game, pointing out the obvious usually. I don't really dislike women commenators, just prefer the traditional male ones.
 
Strange maybe the wrong word, but I don't get how people get so down on commentary just on the sex of who is speaking, surely it's what they say than who they are?
Two scenarios - commentary and punditry - which I think have different requirements. When we are all accustomed to a male voice on commentary (in the men’s game) then a female voice can come across as more high pitched which some might feel is grating and I understand that takes a bit of getting used to - it did for me. But then I think of Steve McNamamen who always sounds squeaky, or Carragher whose accent I detest, or even my beloved Hoddle who can sound quite dreary when commentating. Add others to the list.
The question is can a commentator accurately and usefully describe what is happening in a game as it unfolds and add insightful input as the game progresses, and can a pundit offer decent analysis of what has happened after the event.
Competency is what matters rather then who is speaking, regardless or whether male, female, or club allegiance.
 
Back